Editorial Type: NOTES AND FIELD REPORTS
 | 
Online Publication Date: 16 Jun 2020

Reproductive Longevity of Loggerhead Sea Turtles Nesting in Greece

,
,
,
, and
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 133 – 136
DOI: 10.2744/CCB-1437.1
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Following a multi-decadal tagging program at loggerhead nesting areas in Greece, 28 individual turtles have been identified with reproductive longevities greater than 21 yrs, ranging from 22 to 33 yrs. Continuation of this long-term tagging program, along with improvement of tag retention through usage of PIT tags, are expected to increase the herein reported maximum reproductive longevity of loggerhead turtles.

Reproductive longevity data for female sea turtles (i.e., time span in years since recruitment to the nesting population) are very useful in population modeling as well as understanding the contribution of individual turtles to the population. Although it is known that marine turtles are long-lived animals, data on their reproductive life span are rather scarce (Miller 1997). As a result, population models are frequently based on reproductive longevities borrowed from other populations, sometimes in other continents or even for other species. For example, the recent Regional Red List for Caretta caretta in the Mediterranean used data on reproductive longevity from loggerhead populations in other ocean basins (Casale 2015). Reproductive longevity in the Mediterranean remains largely unknown, with the only documented record reported from Cyprus being for a loggerhead turtle nesting up to 25 yrs (Omeyer et al. 2019). Scarcity of such data stem from the fact that determining reproductive longevity requires multi-decadal tagging studies involving recaptures of marked females in nesting areas, which are logistically challenging.

A tagging program was initiated in 1982, with the assistance of biology students and support from the Ministry of Environment, at the loggerhead nesting areas of Laganas Bay (Zakynthos Island) and Kyparissia Bay in Greece (Fig. 1). Following the foundation of the Nongovernmental Organization (NGO) ARCHELON in 1983, this organization gradually assumed responsibility for the tagging program that became a major component of its fieldwork. The two rookeries referenced above host the largest nesting aggregations of Caretta caretta in the Mediterranean, concentrating about 46% of all loggerhead nests in this sea basin (Casale et al. 2018). Systematic marking and recapturing of turtles at these 2 nesting areas comprises the oldest ongoing tagging program in the Mediterranean, spanning 38 nesting seasons from 1982 to 2019. An important aspect of this multi-decadal program is the assessment of the reproductive longevity of loggerhead turtles in Zakynthos and Kyparissia Bay, which we have characterized and report herein.

Figure 1Figure 1Figure 1
Figure 1 Sketch map showing location of Zakynthos and Kyparissia Bay in Greece.

Citation: Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World's Turtle and Tortoise Journal 19, 1; 10.2744/CCB-1437.1

Study Areas

Turtle nesting on Zakynthos Island (Fig. 1) occurs at 6 nesting beaches, totaling 5.5 km in length, fringing Laganas Bay at the southern coast of the island. Tagging in Zakynthos was primarily carried out at the 0.6-km-long Sekania beach (approximate middle of the beach: 37°43′30″N, 20°56′15″E, WGS 84), which hosts the highest density of nests (Margaritoulis 2005; Margaritoulis et al. 2011). In Kyparissia Bay (Fig. 1), loggerhead turtles nest along the 44-km beach from the river Alfios in the north to the river Arcadikos in the south (Margaritoulis and Rees 2001). Tagging effort at Kyparissia Bay was focused on the southernmost 9.5-km beach length (from about 37°22′30″N, 21°40′58″E to 37°17′30″N, 21°41′33″E, WGS 84), which comprises the core area of the nesting habitat because of the high concentration of nests (Margaritoulis and Rees 2001).

Methods

Tagging and re-identifying previously tagged turtles was completed every nesting season from 1982 until 2019 (except for the 1999 season on Zakynthos, when no observations were made), from about the beginning of June until beginning of August, with varying temporal and spatial intensity depending on human resources and logistics. Tagging teams consisting of 2–3 trained volunteers patrolled the assigned beach sectors at night by walking along the wet sand. When they spotted an upward track of an emerged turtle, they followed it until they neared the turtle from behind. Turtles were allowed to nest before they were checked for tags; if there were no tags present they were tagged with external tags. Two types of tags were used: 1) Monel metal tags (style 1005-49 and 1005-681; National Band and Tag Company, USA) applied on front flippers, and 2) plastic tags (cattle-ear Jumbo tags; Dalton Ltd., UK) applied mostly on hind flippers. Generally, turtles were double-tagged, and whenever a turtle was found with only one tag, a second tag was usually applied. Illegible tags, resulting from corrosion, fouling with marine organisms, or embodiment in tissue, were generally removed (Fig. 2) and replaced with new tags. Tags were placed in predefined locations through the membrane between scales at the trailing (posterior) edge of the flippers. We discontinued the usage of 1005-49 Monel tags in 1990 as these tags were rather large and we also stopped using plastic tags in 2015 because there was evidence of interference with fishing gears and increasing entanglement (see also Nichols et al. 1998). In addition to external tags, electronic passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags (11.5 × 2.1 mm; Trovan Ltd.) were also used starting in 2005 in Kyparissia Bay and in 2012 in Zakynthos. Turtles with existing tags or with scars at the defined tagging locations were characterized as “remigrants” while turtles without tags, or scars attributable to tagging, were registered as “neophytes.” Every newly tagged turtle was assigned a unique ID, usually the firstly applied tag code, and all subsequently applied tags were related to this ID. Turtles without tags but with scars attributed to lost tags were retagged and assigned a new ID. Tagging data were compiled annually in specially designed databases (Microsoft Excel) and were organized by the ID of each individual turtle. For the present study, we used this archive to investigate the reproductive longevity of loggerhead turtles in Greece.

Figure 2Figure 2Figure 2
Figure 2 Examples of tags removed from turtles: (a) deterioration of locking mechanism probably due to biting by males during courtship; (b) heavy fouling by barnacles; (c) highly corroded. Photographs by Dimitris Margaritoulis.

Citation: Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World's Turtle and Tortoise Journal 19, 1; 10.2744/CCB-1437.1

Results

During the 37 nesting seasons in Zakynthos (1982–1998, 2000–2019) and the 38 seasons in Kyparissia Bay (1982–2019), a total of 5707 “neophyte” turtles were tagged in both areas: 3406 in Zakynthos and 2301 in Kyparissia Bay. A number of these turtles subsequently appeared without tags but with scars at the defined tagging sites and so were retagged. Many of the above marked turtles, either neophytes or with scars, retained their tags and were identified in subsequent nesting seasons, with 28 of them revealing reproductive longevities of over 21 yrs. Specifically, 20 individuals on Zakynthos showed reproductive longevities ranging from 22 through 33 yrs (Table 1) and 8 turtles in Kyparissia Bay from 22 through 29 yrs (Table 2). These turtles were observed nesting within 3–12 seasons on Zakynthos (Table 1) and within 6–13 seasons in Kyparissia Bay (Table 2). It is noted that 9 of these turtles (32%) were recorded as already scarred on their first encounter (which contributed to their longevity record), and hence their actual reproductive time span is certainly longer. An example of repeated tagging manipulation of turtles with missing or illegible tags is shown in Table 3.

Table 1 Turtles with reproductive longevity of > 21 yrs, observed in Zakynthos following 37 seasons of tagging (1982–1998, 2000–2019). Asterisk denotes individuals with scars attributed to previous tagging. Turtle B2314 was observed making one nest in Kyparissia Bay during one season.
Table 1
Table 2 Turtles with reproductive longevity of > 21 yrs, observed in Kyparissia Bay following 38 seasons of tagging (1982–2019). Asterisk denotes individuals with scars attributed to previous tagging.
Table 2
Table 3 Observation dates and respective tag codes of Turtle B2494 with a 33-yr reproductive longevity in Zakynthos. Dagger (†) denotes illegible characters on tag.
Table 3

Discussion

As far as we can determine, the herein directly documented reproductive longevity of 33 yrs for Caretta caretta is the longest published so far at a global scale. In the southwestern Indian Ocean, loggerheads nest up to 18 yrs (Nel et al. 2013); in the United States, loggerhead turtles were recorded nesting over a time span of 23 yrs in Florida (Ehrhart et al. 2014) and 31 yrs in Georgia (Ondich and Andrews 2013); and in Brazil, loggerheads were recorded nesting over a time span of 32 yrs (Barreto et al. 2019). It is worth noting that reproductive longevity based on inference from skeletal growth mark analysis has been estimated up to 46 yrs for stranded loggerheads in the northwestern Atlantic (Avens et al. 2015).

It is apparent that the herein recorded longevities depend on several factors such as the duration of the tagging program over the years, the intensity of tagging effort, and the program's temporal and spatial coverage. Further, it is known that flipper tags, either metal or plastic, on female turtles exhibit significant losses over time (Limpus 1992; Bjorndal et al. 1996; Bellini et al. 2001; Ehrhart et al. 2014) as a result of dragging of flippers on sand during the nesting procedure, biting by males during courtship, faulty application, weakening of locking mechanism, coverage by fouling organisms, and seawater chemistry (see Limpus 1992, Bellini et al. 2001). On the other hand, PIT tags, applied in the last few years in our tagging program and which are documented to be retained by turtles for more years than are flipper tags (see also Braun McNeill et al. 2013; Omeyer et al. 2019), will improve long-term identification of nesting females and will increase the currently directly observed reproductive longevity of loggerhead turtles in Greece.

Tribute to Peter C.H. Pritchard

We dedicate this article to the recently passed Dr Peter Pritchard who provided several ideas in the early efforts to conserve sea turtles in Greece.

Acknowledgments

We thank the many volunteers, field assistants, and leaders who have spent thousands of working hours at nighttime patrols, tagging turtles, and recording data. D.M. thanks Dr Jack Frazier, who assisted in the initiation of the tagging program and himself tagged several turtles in July 1982 on Sekania beach. The tagging program was implemented under a research permit, renewed biannually, initially by the Ministry of Agriculture and since 2005 by the Ministry of the Environment and the National Marine Park of Zakynthos. All turtles were handled with care, following internationally accepted procedures (e.g., Eckert et al. 1999). Over the years, partial funding of the program was supplied by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Ministry of Environment, World Wildlife Fund International (WWF), the European Commission, and several private donors. The National Marine Park of Zakynthos provided PIT tags used in the period 2012–2014. We thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript.

LITERATURE CITED

  • Avens, L., Goshe, L.R., Coggins, L., Snover, M.L., Pajuelo, M., Bjorndal, K.A., AND Bolten,A.B. 2015. Age and size at maturation and adult-stage duration for loggerhead sea turtles in the western North Atlantic.Marine Biology162:17491767.
  • Barreto, J., Thomé, J.C., Baptistotte, C., Rieth, D., Marcovaldi, M.â., Marcovaldi, G.G.D., Bellini, C., Scalfoni J.T., Filgueiras, H., Vila-Verde, L., Cabral, L., Marcondes, A.C., AND Almeida,A.P. 2019. Reproductive longevity of the loggerhead sea turtle, Caretta caretta, in Espírito Santo, Brazil.Marine Turtle Newsletter157:1012.
  • Bellini, C., Godfrey, M.H., AND Sanchez,T.M. 2001. Tag loss in wild juvenile hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) sea turtles.Herpetological Review32:172174.
  • Bjorndal, K.A., Bolten, A.B., Lagueux, C.J., AND Chaves,A. 1996. Probability of tag loss in green turtles nesting at Tortuguero, Costa Rica.Journal of Herpetology30:566571.
  • Braun Mcneill, J., Schueller, A.M., Avens, L., Goodman Hall, A., Goshe, L.R., AND Epperly,S.P. 2013. Estimates of tag loss for loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the western North Atlantic.Herpetological Review44(
    2
    ): 221226.
  • Casale, P. 2015. Caretta caretta (Mediterranean subpopulation).The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T83644804A83646294. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.20154.RLTS.T83644804A83646294.en (14 March 2020).
  • Casale, P., Broderick, A.C., Camiñas, J.A., Cardona, L., Carreras, C., Demetropoulos, A., Fuller, W.J., Godley, B.J., Hochscheid, S., Kaska, Y., Lazar, B., Margaritoulis, D., Panagopoulou, A., Rees, A.F., Tomás, J., AND Türkozan,O. 2018. Mediterranean sea turtles: current knowledge and priorities for conservation and research.Endangered Species Research36:229267.
  • Eckert, K.L., Bjorndal, K.A., Abreu-Grobois, F.A., AND Donnelly,M. (EDS.). 1999. Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles.
    IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No. 4
    .
  • Ehrhart, L., Redfoot, W., Bagley, D., AND Mansfield,K. 2014. Long-term trends in loggerhead (Caretta caretta) nesting and reproductive success at an important western Atlantic rookery.Chelonian Conservation and Biology13:173181.
  • Limpus, C.J. 1992. Estimation of tag loss in marine turtle research.Wildlife Research19:457469.
  • Margaritoulis, D. 2005. Nesting activity and reproductive output of loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, over 19 seasons (1984–2002) at Laganas Bay, Zakynthos, Greece: the largest rookery in the Mediterranean.Chelonian Conservation and Biology4(
    4
    ): 916929.
  • Margaritoulis, D. and Rees,A.F. 2001. The loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta, population nesting in Kyparissia Bay, Peloponnesus, Greece: results of beach surveys over seventeen seasons and determination of the core nesting habitat.Zoology in the Middle East24:7590.
  • Margaritoulis, D., Rees, A.F., Dean, C.J., AND Riggall,T. 2011. Reproductive data of loggerhead turtles in Laganas Bay, Zakynthos Island, Greece, 2003–2009.Marine Turtle Newsletter131:26.
  • Miller, J.D. 1997. Reproduction in sea turtles.In:Lutz,P.L. and Musick,J.A. (Eds.). The Biology of Sea Turtles.
    Boca Raton, FL
    :
    CRC Press, Marine Science Series
    , pp. 5181.
  • Nel, R., Punt, A.E., AND Hughes,G.R. 2013. Are coastal protected areas always effective in achieving population recovery for nesting sea turtles?PLoS ONE8(
    5
    ): e63525. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063525.
  • Nichols, W.J., Seminoff, J.A., AND Resendiz,A. 1998. Plastic “rototags” may be linked to sea turtle by-catch.Marine Turtle Newsletter79:2021.
  • Omeyer, L.C.M., Casale, P., Fuller, W.J., Godley, B.J., Holmes, K.E., Snape, R.T.E., AND Broderick,A.C. 2019. The importance of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags for measuring life-history traits of sea turtles.Biological Conservation240:108248.
  • Ondich, B.L. and Andrews,K.M. 2013. A history of sea turtle tagging and monitoring on Jekyll Island, Georgia, USA.Marine Turtle Newsletter138:1115.
Copyright: © 2020 Chelonian Research Foundation 2020
Figure 1
Figure 1

Sketch map showing location of Zakynthos and Kyparissia Bay in Greece.


Figure 2
Figure 2

Examples of tags removed from turtles: (a) deterioration of locking mechanism probably due to biting by males during courtship; (b) heavy fouling by barnacles; (c) highly corroded. Photographs by Dimitris Margaritoulis.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author

Handling Editor: Jeffrey A. Seminoff

Received: 02 Feb 2020
Accepted: 08 Apr 2020
  • Download PDF