Characterization of Microsatellite Loci for the Razorback Musk Turtle (Sternotherus carinatus) and Their Cross-Amplification in Five Other Species in the Family Kinosternidae
Abstract
Studies of mud and musk turtles (family Kinosternidae) are underrepresented in the primary turtle literature, particularly with regard to their population genetics. We have isolated microsatellite loci for Sternotherus carinatus, a first for any species in the family, and tested their ability to cross-amplify in 5 other kinosternids. These loci should provide a useful set of tools for future population genetic studies of kinosternid species.
Turtles are among the most imperiled vertebrates on the planet with an estimated 52.2%–61% considered by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to be extinct or in a threatened category—critically endangered, endangered, or vulnerable (Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [TTWG] 2017; Lovich et al. 2018). Genetic studies have become an important conservation tool in biology by evaluating the genetic health of populations, resolving taxonomic uncertainties, and identifying evolutionarily significant units (Frankham 2003). Microsatellite loci have long been used in biology to address questions of population genetics (Selkoe and Toonen 2006), and they have important applications in the field of conservation biology. While there is a rapidly expanding amount of literature on the biology of turtles, some species are receiving more attention than others (Lovich and Ennen 2013). For instance, the majority of microsatellite loci used in population genetic studies have been optimized for emydid species such as the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis; Ciofi et al. 2009), the bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii; King and Julian 2004), the Blanding's turtle (Emydoidea blandingii; Osentoski et al. 2002; Libants et al. 2004), and the diamondback terrapin (Malaclemmys terrapin; Hauswaldt and Glenn 2003). The microsatellite loci from these studies have also been tested for cross-amplification and optimized for other species such as the spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata; Davy and Murphy 2014) and several Graptemys species (King and Julian 2004; Selman et al. 2009), but very few (only 3 of 40) of these microsatellite loci have been successfully cross-amplified in a mud or musk turtle species (Hauswaldt and Glenn 2003; Schwartz et al. 2003).
Even though the taxonomy of Kinosternidae (mud and musk turtles) is still a work in progress, as made evident by the recent recognition of cryptic diversity within the genera Sternotherus (Scott et al. 2018) and Kinosternon (López-Luna et al. 2018), there are currently 30 described species within Kinosternidae, making it one of the most diverse families of turtles globally (TTWG 2017). However, mud and musk turtles are among the least-studied turtles in the United States and Canada (Lovich and Ennen 2013), and relatively little work has been conducted on many of the Central and South American varieties. This highlights the need for versatile genetic markers for this group of turtles.
In this study, we identified microsatellite loci for the razorback musk turtle (Sternotherus carinatus), a small to medium-sized (up to 18 cm) turtle with predominately lotic tendencies. It occupies rivers, streams, and oxbows from the Brazos River drainage in Central Texas to the Escatawpa River drainage in Southwestern Alabama and into some Mississippi River drainages in Southeastern Oklahoma and Arkansas (Lindeman 2008). We also tested these loci for cross-amplification in 5 other kinosternid species: the stripe-necked musk turtle (Sternotherus peltifer), the eastern musk turtle (Sternotherus odoratus), the eastern mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum), and the striped mud turtle (Kinosternon baurii) as well as the federally protected flattened musk turtle (Sternotherus depressus; US Fish and Wildlife Service 1987), a species endemic to Alabama where it is considered of “High Conservation Concern” as well as critically endangered by IUCN (2011). Identifying variable genetic markers for the razorback musk turtle will provide the tools necessary to help fill gaps in our understanding of the ecology and evolutionary history of this species and others in this overlooked family.
Methods
We trapped razorback musk turtles (Sternotherus carinatus) from the Leaf River in Hattiesburg, Mississippi using 3-ft-diameter hoop nets baited with sardines in soybean oil (Beach Cliff). We collected a 5-mm snippet of interdigital webbing from the hindfoot of each turtle to store as a genetic sample. The sample was preserved in 100% ethanol until total genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen Inc). Genomic DNA from one razorback musk turtle was sent to the Savannah River Ecology Lab Molecular Ecology Lab (SREL MEL), where they prepared an Illumina pair-end shotgun library for sequencing (Lance et al. 2013) and subsequently used PAL_FINDER_v0.02.03 (Castoe et al. 2012) to identify di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide microsatellite sequences (i.e., nucleotide repeat motifs) among the reads. Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky 1999) was used to develop primers for 6766 potential microsatellite loci. We screened a total of 60 penta- and tetranucleotide loci, focusing on loci whose sequences only appeared 1–2 times within the sequence reads, to reduce the likelihood of targeting repetitive loci.
We initially screened potential microsatellite loci for amplification success and variability across 5 individuals of Sternotherus carinatus. For those loci that amplified well, we subsequently genotyped 30 Sternotherus carinatus from the Leaf River in Hattiesburg, Mississippi (31°20′16″N, 89°16′48.2″W; WGS84). We also tested all loci for cross-amplification across 5 other kinosternids (Kinosternon baurii [n = 5], K. subrubrum [n = 5], S. depressus [n = 5], S. peltifer [n = 5], and S. odoratus [n = 4]). Amplifications were conducted in a total volume of 12.5 µl using 7.76 µl of dH2O, 1.25 µl 10× standard Taq (Mg-free) buffer (New England Biolabs), 0.75 µl 2 mM dNTPs, 0.75 µl 25 mM MgCl2, 0.25 units Taq polymerase (New England Biolabs), 0.4 µl of 10 mM M13 tailed forward (Boutin-Ganache et al. 2001) and reverse primers, 0.09 µl of 1 µM labeled M-13 primer (LICOR Co.), and 20–50 ng of DNA template. PCR cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at a locus-specific annealing temperature of 54°C–56°C (see Table 1), and 1 min at 72°C with a final elongation of 10 min at 72°C. Microsatellites alleles were visualized on a polyacrylamide gel using a LICOR 4300 DNA Analyzer. Alleles were sized using GeneProfiler ver. 4.05 (LICOR Co). Some loci required further optimization in terms of PCR conditions with modifications made to the annealing temperature and the amount of Taq polymerase (Table 1). For the additional kinosternid species in this study, we only tested for amplification under standard PCR conditions with an annealing temperature of 56°C. We calculated summary statistics for each locus using GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse 2012), and we tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium within loci and linkage disequilibrium between loci using the probability tests of GENEPOP for the web (Raymond and Rousset 1995; Rousset 2008). We adjusted our alpha values using a sequential Bonferroni correction to account for multiple comparisons (Rice 1989).
Results
Of the 60 loci we tested, 40 amplified in one or more species (Table 1). Of these, we optimized reaction conditions for 25 microsatellite loci that amplified in Sternotherus carinatus samples (n = 30). Numbers of alleles for these loci ranged from 2 to 15 (mean = 7.6, SE = 3.4) for S. carinatus, with observed heterozygosity values of 0.138 to 0.963 (mean = 0.657, SE = 0.202) and expected heterozygosity values of 0.128 to 0.910 (mean = 0.687, SE = 0.207). Only one locus deviated significantly from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Scar24), and no loci exhibited linkage disequilibrium. For the additional kinosternid species in this study, the total number of successfully amplified polymorphic loci was 26 for Sternotherus odoratus, 16 for S. peltifer, 13 for S. depressus, 14 for Kinosternon bauriii, and 6 for K. subrubrum (Table 2).
Discussion
Mud and musk turtles of the family Kinosternidae are among some of the least-studied turtles in the world (Lovich and Ennen 2013), and this study is the first to optimize microsatellite loci designed specifically for a kinosternid turtle. The loci were designed by using DNA from the razorback musk turtle, but they cross-amplified well in 5 other species of mud and musk turtles. Microsatellite loci remain an affordable and effective method to study population genetics (Selkoe and Toonen 2006). They can be used at relatively little cost, which can be reduced further by multiplexing loci with alleles in different size ranges (e.g., Scar08 and Scar19; Scar24 and Scar36). Furthermore, in contrast to next-generation approaches like RAD-Seq, microsatellite loci are amenable to adding additional individuals to the data set as opportunity and funding allows.
Although populations of most kinosternids are considered stable across the southeastern United States (with the notable exception of the critically endangered Sternotherus depressus), there is still much we do not know about the evolutionary history of these species, as made evident by the recent description of Sternotherus intermedius (Scott et al. 2018). The loci described herein should prove useful for studies evaluating the contemporary and historic levels of connectivity (i.e., gene flow) in kinosternid species as well as for evaluating levels of genetic diversity within and among populations. Because lower genetic diversity has been correlated with lower fitness in turtles (Ennen et al. 2010), it is important to understand gene flow among isolated or fragmented populations that may be susceptible to genetic drift or inbreeding depression, particularly in threatened species (Ennen et al. 2010; Shaffer et al. 2015). A better understanding of the population genetics of these species will allow for more informed management decisions and will benefit the long-term survival of a species. We are currently using these loci to evaluate range-wide population structure in razorback musk turtles and to assess patterns of co-ocurrence and potential hybridization in S. carinatus and S. peltifer (G.J.B., unpubl. data, 2020).
Contributor Notes
Handling Editor: Luca Luiselli