Editorial Type: NOTES AND FIELD REPORTS
 | 
Online Publication Date: 12 May 2021

Predation on Translocated Burmese Star Tortoise (Geochelone platynota) by Asiatic Jackals (Canis aureus) and Wild Pigs (Sus scrofa) at a Wildlife Sanctuary in Myanmar

,
,
,
,
,
, and
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 133 – 138
DOI: 10.2744/CCB-1461.1
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Successful restoration of Geochelone platynota to Dry Zone ecosystems in Myanmar depends on the survival of translocated tortoises and, therefore, a knowledge of predators and predation is important. We here report the loss of 28 and approximately 200 translocated G. platynota to Eurasian golden jackals (Canis aureus) and wild pigs (Sus scrofa), respectively, at Shwe Settaw Wildlife Sanctuary in central Myanmar. Measures to reduce the risk of future predation include structural reinforcement of acclimation pens to deter wild pigs and the experimental use of large cat (e.g., tiger [Panthera tigris] and leopard [Panthera pardus]) odors to repel jackals and wild pigs from the translocation area.

Understanding predator–prey relationships is important when undertaking translocations because translocations concentrate animals in relatively small areas, causing an increase in local abundance, attracting predators, and occasionally resulting in intense predation (Esque et al. 2010; Cypher et al. 2018). Additionally, captive-born offspring are often naïve and more likely to fall victim to predators, resident predators may exhibit surplus killing behavior upon encountering easily captured naïve prey, and translocated individuals are disoriented when released into unfamiliar environments, making them more vulnerable to predators (Letty et al. 2007; Cypher et al. 2018). Because even a few predators can decimate populations of naïve prey (Kruuk 1972), predation has the potential to influence the outcome of wildlife translocations (Short et al. 1992; Letty et al. 2007).

The Burmese star tortoise (Geochelone platynota) is a critically endangered tortoise endemic to the semiarid Dry Zone of central Myanmar (Platt et al. 2011). Historical sources suggest that G. platynota was once abundant within this region (Blyth 1863; Theobald 1868), where it occurred in a variety of habitats (Platt et al. 2011). Chronic subsistence harvesting by rural Burmese, coupled with habitat loss to agriculture, resulted in long-term albeit gradual population declines that suddenly accelerated in the 1990s when poaching became rampant in response to demand from the burgeoning transboundary wildlife trade with China (Behler 1997; Platt et al. 2011). By the early 2000s, viable populations could no longer be found even within protected areas, leading Platt et al. (2011) to conclude that G. platynota was functionally extinct in the wild. A conservation breeding program launched in the mid-2000s staved off biological extinction (Platt et al. 2017), and translocations of captive-bred and head-started G. platynota are currently underway at 2 wildlife sanctuaries in the Dry Zone (Platt and Platt 2019). Successful restoration of G. platynota as an ecologically functional member of Dry Zone ecosystems ultimately depends on the survival of translocated tortoises (Platt et al. 2014). Here, we document predation of translocated G. platynota by Eurasian golden jackals (Canis aureus; jackal hereafter) and wild pigs (Sus scrofa) at a wildlife sanctuary in central Myanmar.

Study Area. — Our observations were made at Shwe Settaw Wildlife Sanctuary (SSWS; 20°12′N, 94°33′E), a 37,500-ha protected area in the Magway Region of central Myanmar (Beffasti and Galanti 2011) established in 1940 for the protection of the endemic Eld's deer (Recervus eldii) (Bowler et al. 2019). SSWS is characterized by a largely intact, relatively open, dry deciduous forest with a dense grass understory (Platt et al. 2001; Bowler et al. 2019). SSWS encompasses one of the largest tracts of dry deciduous forest remaining in Myanmar (Beffasti and Galanti 2011). Mean annual rainfall in this region is approximately 900 mm with most precipitation falling between late May and October, followed by a prolonged dry season extending from early November through May (Platt et al. 2001). The sanctuary is surrounded by 39 villages with 26,000 inhabitants, and the adjacent lands are a mosaic of village agricultural fields, scrub, and small forest patches (Bowler et al. 2019). The physical and cultural environment of SSWS is described in greater detail elsewhere (Platt et al. 2001; Bowler et al. 2019). Geochelone platynota occurred in SSWS until the early 2000s when populations were extirpated by intensive poaching (Platt et al. 2001, 2011). Given on-going security concerns regarding the potential theft and poaching of head-started tortoises (e.g., Platt 2016), specific locations within SSWS are not disclosed in this article.

Tortoise Translocations. — We began translocating captive-bred and head-started G. platynota to SSWS during late 2016 (Platt 2016) in accordance with a national conservation action plan (Platt et al. 2014). Our translocation protocols are described in greater detail elsewhere (Platt and Platt 2020); however, to briefly summarize, we source 3- to 6-yr-old head-started tortoises (carapace length [CL] ∼ 120–200 mm) from 3 captive-breeding centers in Myanmar (Platt et al. 2017) and use a soft-release strategy (e.g., Tuberville et al. 2005); i.e., tortoises are confined for 12 mo in 1-ha acclimation pens at the release site before being liberated. We attach a very high frequency (VHF) radio transmitter (Ri-2B; Holohil Systems Ltd., Carp, Ontario, Canada) to 20–30 tortoises in each translocation cohort and follow these individuals for the life of the transmitter batteries (∼ 24 mo). From 2016 to 2018, we successfully released 1038 head-started G. platynota into the wild. On 19 February 2019, we transferred an additional 650 captive-bred tortoises into 3 acclimation pens with the intention of releasing this cohort in late January 2020. The release cohort consisted of tortoises aged 3–5 yrs old with a mean (± 1 SD) CL of 152 ± 14 mm (range = 115–198 mm).

Jackal Predation. — While radio-tracking tortoises in February and March 2019, we found the fresh remains of 28 G. platynota killed by predators. Most tortoise remains consisted of disarticulated pieces of the carapace and plastron, with the muscle and viscera largely consumed by the predators. We found VHF transmitters at 16 kill sites, allowing us to identify individual tortoises (8 males and 8 females), all of which were released from acclimation pens on 19 January 2018. The mean (± 1 SD) CL of these 16 tortoises immediately prior to release was 168 ± 16 mm (range = 142–203 mm), although additional growth undoubtedly occurred during the 13–14 mo these tortoises were living in the wild. The remains of 12 other tortoises that we found during this period could not be assigned to particular individuals. However, the proximity (< 1 km) of these kill sites to the acclimation pens suggest these tortoises were likewise among those released in 2018.

We found canid tracks at most kill sites and the bite marks on tortoise remains were consistent with descriptions of canid predation (Causey and Cude 1978), strongly suggesting these tortoises were killed by jackals, the only canid known to occur within SSWS (Linnell et al. 2014). Moreover, an automated game camera (Reconyx PC800 Hyperfire Professional; Reconyx, Holmen, WI) deployed in the area soon after we discovered the first instances of predation captured images of a jackal carrying a tortoise on 10 March 2019 (0419 hrs) (Fig. 1). Because scavenging can be difficult to distinguish from predation, except under unusual circumstances (e.g., Platt et al. 2010), the possibility that we misinterpreted scavenging events as predation is acknowledged but considered unlikely. We are unaware of any further tortoise predation by jackals subsequent to the last documented killing on 10 March 2019.

Figure 1.Figure 1.Figure 1.
Figure 1. (A) Camera trap image of an Asiatic golden jackal (Canis aureus) carrying a translocated Burmese star tortoise (Geochelone platynota) at Shwe Settaw Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar on 10 March 2019. The jackal is carrying the tortoise by a foreleg. This is 1 of 28 translocated tortoises killed by jackals during a 5-wk spate of predation in February and March 2019. (B) Thirteen minutes later the camera recorded another—or possibly the same—jackal at this location.

Citation: Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World's Turtle and Tortoise Journal 20, 1; 10.2744/CCB-1461.1

Wild Pig Predation. — During heavy rains on the night of 14 July 2019, a sounder of wild pigs (Fig. 2) penetrated the bamboo fence of an acclimation pen containing 217 tortoises awaiting release (scheduled for January 2020) and killed an undetermined number of these animals. On the following night (15 July 2019), amidst another heavy monsoonal thunderstorm, wild pigs returned, broke into a second acclimation pen containing 217 tortoises, and again killed an undetermined number of tortoises. One of us (S.H.N.A.) arrived the following day and installed metal flashing around the base of the 3 acclimation pens that effectively deterred further incursions by wild pigs and prevented the escape of surviving tortoises.

Figure 2.Figure 2.Figure 2.
Figure 2. A sounder of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) photographed by a camera trap deployed near 3 acclimation pens holding head-started Burmese star tortoises (Geochelone platynota) awaiting release at Shwe Settaw Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar.

Citation: Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World's Turtle and Tortoise Journal 20, 1; 10.2744/CCB-1461.1

Together with Forest Department Staff and Community Conservation Volunteers, we then searched the 2 compromised pens for tortoises. Our search recovered the remains of numerous tortoises, most of which had been crushed and consumed by wild pigs. Obtaining an accurate count of mortalities proved difficult because shell (carapace and plastron) fragments from multiple tortoises were mixed together in a confusing jumble at most kill sites within the pens. Based on the forensic reconstruction of these bony elements, we estimate that wild pigs killed at least 200 tortoises in the 2 acclimation pens. We recovered 26 surviving tortoises from the 2 pens which originally held 434 tortoises. We were unable to account for the remaining 208 tortoises, leaving us to conclude that either our estimates of mortality are conservative or, more likely, many surviving tortoises escaped before the pens could be searched.

Discussion. — To our knowledge, these observations constitute the first reports of predation on G. platynota (see review by Platt et al. 2011). Jackals are mesocarnivores (5–15 kg) typically considered to be opportunistic, generalist predators (Nowak 1999; but see Hayward et al. 2017). Small mammals comprise the bulk of the diet (Hayward et al. 2017), but jackals also consume carrion, plants and fruit, ground-dwelling birds, small vertebrates, and invertebrates (Corelett 2011). Although “reptiles” are reported in many dietary studies (e.g., Mukherjee et al. 2004; Ćirović et al. 2016), specific accounts of turtle predation by jackals appear rare, but include predation on nesting marine turtles (Akeinar et al. 2006; Özdilek et al. 2015) and crowned roof turtles (Hardella thurjii) moving overland to escape drying ponds (Das and Bhupathy 2009). That said, predation on G. platynota by jackals is not unexpected given that predation on Gopherus tortoises by feral dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and the ecologically similar coyote (Canis latrans) is well-documented in North America (Causey and Cude 1978; Esque et al. 2010).

Wild pig predation of G. platynota at SSWS occurred under conditions of confinement where tortoises were concentrated with little opportunity for concealment or escape, which no doubt accounts for the extensive mortality that resulted. Although excessive killing of confined and disadvantaged prey by predators is common (Short et al. 2002), we see no reason to assume our observations are an artifact of captivity and that wild pig predation of free-living G. platynota does not occur. Wild pigs are opportunistic, generalist omnivores that at times can be aggressive predators (Mayer 2013). Wild pigs have an extremely varied diet consisting largely of plants, but also includes invertebrates, small and large vertebrates, and carrion (Ditchkoff and Mayer 2009). The bony carapace of chelonians offers little deterrence to wild pigs, which crush and consume even large bones when eating mammal carcasses (Mayer 2013). Indeed, wild pig predation of eggs, juveniles, and adult turtles (Culbertson 1907; Fordham et al. 2006; Leary et al. 2008), including other Testudinidae (Taylor and Hellgren 1997), is widely reported and considered a threat to the survival of some populations.

We speculate the extirpation of apex predators such as tiger (Panthera tigris) and leopard (Panthera pardus) from SSWS 35–50 yrs ago (Linnell et al. 2014) led to an expansion of jackal and wild pig populations (i.e., mesopredator release; Crooks and Soulé 1999), ultimately resulting in a heightened risk of predation for G. platynota. The relationship between jackals and apex predators is complex (Hayward et al. 2017). On one hand, apex predators provision jackals with carrion (Hayward et al. 2017), but on the other hand jackals are killed and eaten by larger predators (Palomares and Caro 1999). Where apex predators are absent, jackals have few competitors, exploit a wider variety of prey (including smaller species such as tortoises), and often attain high population densities (Singh et al. 2016; Hayward et al. 2017). Similarly, wild pigs are among the preferred prey of large cats (Karanth and Sunquist 1995) and often become hyper-abundant in areas where these predators are extirpated (Boomgaard 2001; Ickes 2001).

A basic assumption underlying the head-starting of chelonians is that survivorship in the wild will be increased by rearing individuals to a body size less vulnerable to predation (Daly et al. 2018). To this end, we head-start G. platynota for 3–6 yrs with a target CL of approximately 150 mm (about 50% of adult body size). However, our observations at SSWS confirm that jackals are capable of killing tortoises with a CL > 200 mm. Moreover, coyotes are capable of killing adult Gopherus (Esque et al. 2010; Walkup et al. 2019), which are somewhat larger than G. platynota, suggesting that all size classes of the latter are probably vulnerable to jackal predation. Furthermore, even the largest adult G. platynota (Platt et al. 2019) would seem unlikely to survive an encounter with wild pigs, which are known to kill and consume other similar-sized chelonians (Taylor and Hellgren 1997). Head-started tortoises could be at a further disadvantage in predatory encounters because rapid growth under captive conditions can result in less dense and softer shells (Daly et al. 2018). Nevertheless, we consider it worthwhile to continue this practice because head-starting likely confers protection from smaller predators such as snakes, rodents, and birds (Holbrook et al. 2015).

Although our observations confirm that head-started G. platynota are at risk from jackals and wild pigs, overall losses to these predators have thus far been minimal. Since late 2016, we have released 1038 head-started G. platynota into the wild at SSWS and, of these, 28 (2.7%) fell prey to jackals during a 5-wk period in 2019. The drivers underlying this brief, but intense, spate of jackal predation are unknown; however, canids frequently respond to declines in preferred prey by opportunistically shifting predation to other species (Cypher et al. 2018). The loss of a free-ranging tortoise to wild pigs has never been documented at SSWS despite the fact that wild pigs are known to actively seek out and kill concealed chelonians (Fordham et al. 2006). Although we cannot rule out the possibility that other predation events have gone undetected, our continuous post release monitoring of translocated tortoises reinforces the conclusion that predation of head-started G. platynota is uncommon and, at this point, seems to pose little threat to establishing G. platynota in SSWS.

Despite minimal losses to predators to date, measures to mitigate predation risk when translocating tortoises are warranted, particularly with regard to wild pigs. Because tortoises are most at risk from wild pigs when large numbers are concentrated in acclimation pens, predatory incursions are best countered by structural reinforcement of pens (to include electric livestock fencing) and heightened vigilance of the attending staff, augmented with electronic surveillance systems. Mitigation of jackal predation could prove more challenging, especially if particular individuals become “habit predators” that repeatedly target translocated tortoises in the release area (Quinn et al. 2018). Several nonlethal techniques used with varying degrees of success against other canids might prove effective in deterring jackals, including the use of guard dogs and biological odor repellants (Shivik 2004). With respect to the latter, we suggest that the experimental use of tiger or leopard urine, feces, and odor-saturated bedding material (obtained from captive animals) deployed at the translocation site might result in avoidance of the area by jackals and wild pigs (e.g., Apefelbach et al. 2005). Finally, ensuring that robust populations of alternate prey remain available in SSWS by reducing poaching is an obvious first step in ameliorating the loss of tortoises from predation.

Acknowledgments

Translocations of Burmese star tortoises at Shwe Settaw Wildlife Sanctuary are being conducted with the permission and collaboration of the Ministry of Resources and Environmental Conservation. Our conservation efforts were made possible by generous grants from Andy Sabin and the Andrew Sabin Family Foundation, Helmsley Charitable Trust, Panaphil Foundation, and the Turtle Conservation Fund. The warden, staff, and community rangers at Shwe Settaw Wildlife Sanctuary deserve special mention for their unrelenting efforts to save the Burmese star tortoise. We thank Saw Htun, Than Myint, Rick Hudson, Colin Poole, and Bonnie Raphael for their various contributions, and Anak Pattanavibool, Alex Diment, and Cassandra Paul for providing literature, including several key references. Our manuscript benefited from comments provided by Lewis Medlock, Stephanie N. Ajong, and an anonymous reviewer. This paper represents Technical Contribution No. 6884 of the Clemson University Experiment Station.

LITERATURE CITED

  • Akeinar, S., Guclu, O., Taskavak, E., and Turkozan,O. 2006. Golden jackal predation on marine turtles in Goksu Delta, Turkey.In:Frick,M.,Panagopoulou,A.,Rees,A.F., and Williams,K. (Eds.). 26th Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation.
    Athens, Greece
    :
    International Sea Turtle Society
    , p. 120.
  • Apefelbach, R., Blanchard, C.D., Blanchard, R.J., Hayes, R.A., and Mcgregor,I.S. 2005. The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies.Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews29: 11231144.
  • Beffasti, L. and Galanti,V. 2011. Myanmar Protected Areas: Context, Current Status, and Challenges.
    Milan, Italy
    :
    Instituto Oikos and BANCA, Ancora Libri
    , 86 pp.
  • Behler, J.L. 1997. Troubled times for turtles.In:Abbema,J.V. (Ed.). Proceedings: Conservation, Restoration, and Management of Turtles and Tortoises—An International Conference.
    New York
    :
    New York Turtle and Tortoise Society
    , pp. 1322.
  • Blyth, E. 1863. A collection of sundries from different parts of Burma.Journal Asiatic Society of Bengal32: 7890.
  • Boomgaard, P. 2001. Frontiers of Fear: Tigers and People in the Malay World, 1600–1950.
    New Haven, CT
    :
    Yale University Press
    , 306 pp.
  • Bowler, D.E., Nilsen, E.B., Bischof, R., O'hara, R.B., Yu, T.T., Oo, T., Aung, M., and Linell,J.D.C. 2019. Integrating data from different survey types for population monitoring of an endangered species: the case of the Eld's deer.Nature9: 7766.
  • Causey, M.K. and Cude,C.A. 1978. Feral dog predation of the gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus (Reptilia, Testudines, Testudinidae) in southeast Alabama.Herpetological Review9: 9495.
  • Ćirović, A., Penezić, D., and Krofel,M. 2016. Jackals as cleaners: ecosystem services provided by a mesocarnivores in human-dominated landscapes.Biological Conservation199: 5155.
  • Corelett, R.T. 2011. Vertebrate carnivores and predation in the Oriental (Indomalayan) Region.Raffles Bulletin of Zoology59: 325360.
  • Crooks, K.R. and Soulé,M.E. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system.Nature400: 563566.
  • Culbertson, G. 1907. Some notes on the habits of the common box turtle (Cistudo Carolina).Proceedings Indiana Academy of Science1907: 7879.
  • Cypher, B.L., Kelly, E.C., Westall, T.L., and Job,C.L.V.H. 2018. Coyote diet patterns in the Mojave Desert: implications for threatened desert tortoises.Pacific Conservation Biology24: 4454.
  • Daly, J.A., Buhlmann, K.A., Todd, B.D., Moore, C.T., Peaden, J.M., and Tuberville,T.D. 2018. Comparing growth and body condition of indoor-reared, outdoor-reared, and direct-released juvenile Mojave Desert tortoises.Herpetological Conservation and Biology13: 622633.
  • Das, I. and Bhupathy,S. 2009. Hardella thurjii (Gray 1831)—Crowned river turtle.Chelonian Research Monographs5: 23.123.6.
  • Ditchkoff, S.S. and Mayer,J.J. 2009. Wild pig food habits.In:Mayer,J.J. and Brisbin,I.L.,Jr. (Eds.). Wild Pigs: Biology, Damage, Control Techniques, and Management (SRNL-RR-2009-00869).
    Aiken, GA
    :
    Savannah River Ecology Laboratory
    ,
    Aiken
    , pp. 105144.
  • Esque, T.C., Nussear, K.E., Drake, K.K., Walde, A.D., Berry, K.H., Averill-Murray, R.C., Woodman, P.A., Boarman, W.I., Medica, P.A., Mack, J., and Heaton,J.S. 2010. Effects of subsidized predators, resource variability, and human population density on desert tortoise populations in the Mojave Desert, USA.Endangered Species Research12: 167177.
  • Fordham, D.A., Georges, A., Corey, B., and Brook,R.W. 2006. Feral pig predation threatens the indigenous harvest and local persistence of snake-necked turtles in northern Australia.Biological Conservation133: 379388.
  • Hayward, M.W., Porter, L., Lanszki, J., Kamler, J.F., Beck, J.M., Kerley, G.I.H., MacDonald, D.W., Montgomery, R.A., Parker, D.M., Scott, D.M., O'brien, J., and Yarnell,R.W. 2017. Factors affecting prey preferences of jackals (Canidae).Mammalian Biology85: 7082.
  • Holbrook, A.L., Jawor, J.M., Hinderliter, M., and Lee,J.R. 2015. A hatchling gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) care protocol for experimental research and head-starting programs.Herpetological Review46: 538543.
  • Ickes, K. 2001. Hyper-abundance of native wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in a lowland Dipterocarp rain forest of Peninsular Malaysia.Biotropica33: 682990.
  • Karanth, K.U. and Sunquist,M.E. 1995. Prey selection by tiger, leopard, and dhole in tropical forests.Journal of Animal Ecology64: 439450.
  • Kruuk, H. 1972. Surplus killing by carnivores.Journal of Zoology166: 233244.
  • Leary, C.J., Dobie, J.L., Mann, T.M., Floyd, P.S., and Nelson,D.H. 2008. Pseudemys alabamensis Baur 1893—Alabama red-bellied cooter, Alabama red-bellied turtle.Chelonian Research Monographs5: 019.1019.9.
  • Letty, J., Marchandeau, S., and Aubineau,J. 2007. Problems encountered by individuals in animal translocations: lessons from field studies.Ecoscience14: 420431.
  • Linnell, J.D.C., Bischof, R., Gjershaung, J.O., and Mcnutt,L. 2014. Wildlife surveys in Shwesettaw Wildlife Sanctuary: summary of pilot camera trapping sessions in 2014.
    Unpublished report to Norwegian Institute for Nature Research and Myanmar Forest Department
    , 19 pp.
  • Mayer, J.J. 2013. Wild pig attacks on humans.In:Armstrong,J.B. and Gallagher,G.R. (Eds.). Proceedings 15th Wildlife Damage Management Conference,
    University of Nebraska
    ,
    Lincoln
    , pp. 1735.
  • Mukherjee, S., Goyal, S.P., Johnsingh, A.J.T., and Pitman,M.R.P.L. 2004. The importance of rodents in the diet of jungle cat (Felis chaus), caracal (Caracal caracal), and golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India.Journal of Zoology262: 405411.
  • Nowak, R.M. 1999. Walker's Mammals of the World.
    Sixth edition
    .
    Baltimore
    :
    Johns Hopkins University Press
    , 550 pp.
  • Özdilek, S.Y., Akdeniz, B., Firat, A.R., Balkan, E.I., Gürsoy, S., Sönmez, B., and Erduğan,H. 2015. Green turtles (Chelonia mydas) feeding on invasive algae Caulera taxifolia in Turkey.Russian Journal of Herpetology22: 139142.
  • Palomares, F. and Caro,T.M. 1999. Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores.American Naturalist153: 492508.
  • Platt, K., Platt, S.G., Khaing Lay Lay, Yu Thin Thin, Nwe San San, Ko Win Ko, Myo Khin Myo, Kyaw Moe, Soe Me Me, Lwin Tint, Chansue, N., and Charapum,K. 2014. Star tortoise handbook for Myanmar: conservation status, captive husbandry, and reintroduction.Proceedings of a Workshop, Bagan, Myanmar.
    Yangon
    :
    Wildlife Conservation Society
    , 90 pp.
  • Platt, S.G. 2016. The Great Star Tortoise Caper of 2015.Turtle Survival 2015: 39.
  • Platt, S.G. and Platt,K. 2019. Turtle Survival Alliance and Wildlife Conservation Society work together to avert the extinction of turtles in Myanmar.Turtle Survival2019: 3035.
  • Platt, S.G. and Platt,K. 2020. The road to recovery: restoring the Burmese star tortoise as a functional member of Dry Zone ecosystems in Myanmar.Radiata29: 425.
  • Platt, S.G., Platt, K., Khaing Lay Lay, Yu Thin Thin, Htay Aung Shwe, New San San, Soe Me Me, Myo Khin Myo, Ko Win >Ko, Htet Naing Aung Swan, and Rainwater,T.r. 2017. Back from the brink: ex-situ conservation and recovery of the critically endangered Burmese star tortoise (Geochelone platynota) in Myanmar.Herpetological Review48: 570575.
  • Platt, S.G., Salmon, G.T., Miller, S.M., and Rainwater,T.R. 2010. Scavenging by a bobcat, Lynx rufus.Canadian Field-Naturalist124: 265267.
  • Platt, S.G., Khaing Saw Tun, Ko Win Ko, and Kalyar. 2001. A tortoise survey of Shwe Settaw Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar, with notes on the ecology of Geochelone platynota and Indotestudo elongata.Chelonian Conservation and Biology4: 172177.
  • Platt, S.G., Thanda Swe, Ko Win Ko, Platt, K., Myo Khin Myo, Rainwater, T.R., and Emmett,D. 2011. Geochelone platynota (Blyth 1863)—Burmese star tortoise, Kye Leik.Chelonian Research Monographs5: 57.157.9.
  • Platt, S.G., Lwin Tint, Platt, K., Elsey, R.M., and Rainwater,T.R. 2019. Geochelone platynota (Burmese star tortoise). Maximum body size and giantism.Herpetological Review50: 121123.
  • Quinn, D.P., Buhlmann, K.A., Jensen, J.B., Norton, T.M., and Tuberville,T.D. 2018. Post-release movement and survivorship of head-started gopher tortoises.Journal of Wildlife Management82: 15451554.
  • Shivik, J.A. 2004. Non-lethal alternatives for predation management.Sheep and Goat Research Journal19: 6471.
  • Short, J., Bradshaw, S.D., Giles, J., Prince, R.I.T., and Wilson,G.R. 1992. Reintroduction of macropods (Marsupiala: Macropodiodea) in Australia: a review.Biological Conservation62: 189204.
  • Short, J., Kinnear, J.E., and Robley,A. 2002. Surplus killing by introduced predators in Australia—evidence for ineffective anti-predator adaptations in native prey?Biological Conservation103: 282301.
  • Singh, A., Mukherjee, A., Dookia, S., and Kumara,H.N. 2016. High resource availability and lack of competition have increased population of a meso-carnivore—a case study of golden jackal in Keoladeo National Park, India.Mammal Research61: 209219.
  • Taylor, R.B. and Hellgren,H.C. 1997. Diet of feral hogs in the western South Texas Plains.Southwestern Naturalist42: 3339.
  • Theobald, W. 1868. Catalogue of the reptiles of British Birma [sic], embracing the provinces of Pegu, Martaban, and Tennasserim: with descriptions of new or little known species.Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology)10: 467.
  • Tuberville, T.D., Clark, E.E., Buhlmann, K.A., and Gibbons,J.W. 2005. Translocation as a conservation tool: site fidelity and movement of repatriated gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus).Animal Conservation8: 349358.
  • Walkup, D.K., Hibbits, T.J., Ryberg, W.A., Lopez, R.R., Hagedorn, B.W., Preston, J.P., Pittman, W., and Johnson,J.T. 2019. Gopherus polyphemus (gopher tortoise). Predation.Herpetological Review50: 123124.
Copyright: © 2021 Chelonian Research Foundation 2021
Figure 1.
Figure 1.

(A) Camera trap image of an Asiatic golden jackal (Canis aureus) carrying a translocated Burmese star tortoise (Geochelone platynota) at Shwe Settaw Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar on 10 March 2019. The jackal is carrying the tortoise by a foreleg. This is 1 of 28 translocated tortoises killed by jackals during a 5-wk spate of predation in February and March 2019. (B) Thirteen minutes later the camera recorded another—or possibly the same—jackal at this location.


Figure 2.
Figure 2.

A sounder of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) photographed by a camera trap deployed near 3 acclimation pens holding head-started Burmese star tortoises (Geochelone platynota) awaiting release at Shwe Settaw Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author

Handling Editor: Luca Luiselli

Received: 22 Jun 2020
Accepted: 28 Jul 2020
  • Download PDF