Editorial Type: NOTES AND FIELD REPORTS
 | 
Online Publication Date: 21 Jun 2022

Characterization of Microsatellite Loci for the Alligator Snapping Turtle and Cross-Amplification in Two Chelydrid Species

,
, and
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 130 – 135
DOI: 10.2744/CCB-1538.1
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

The alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) has been proposed as a Threatened species under the US Endangered Species Act and is considered Vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. To provide additional markers for conservation genetic studies, we identified 60 potential microsatellite loci, with 38 being polymorphic in M. temminckii, as well as successful cross-amplification of 12 and 32 polymorphic loci in the Suwannee alligator snapping turtle (M. suwanniensis) and Eastern snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina), respectively. These loci will be useful in genetic studies associated with informing future management decisions for M. temminckii and the other species of Chelydridae.

Freshwater turtles are one of the most threatened groups of vertebrates in the world (Rhodin et al. 2018), with 61% of species listed as globally threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable) by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (Turtle Taxonomy Working Group 2017; Lovich et al. 2018). Declining turtle populations have been linked to a series of threats, including habitat destruction and fragmentation, the commercial food and pet trade, invasive species, and incidental bycatch (Stanford et al. 2020). Increasingly, molecular data are being used to help inform management efforts on species of conservation concern (Sethuraman et al. 2014; Spinks et al. 2014; Pierson et al. 2016; Grueber et al. 2018; Gallardo-Alvarez et al. 2019). Such studies often employ microsatellite loci to characterize population genetic structure, detect genetic bottlenecks, estimate effective population sizes, and establish kinship among individuals (Selkoe and Toonen 2006).

The alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) is the largest freshwater turtle in North America, inhabiting rivers and associated oxbow lakes of the southeastern United States. Significant population declines have been reported as a result of historical commercial harvest (Pritchard 1989; Reed et al. 2002). Currently, M. temminckii is fully protected in all states it inhabits, with the exception of Mississippi and Louisiana (NatureServe 2021), and it has been proposed for Threatened status under the US Endangered Species Act (US Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS] 2021a). Thomas et al. (2014) described two new species from the Apalachicola River (Apalachicola alligator snapping turtle, M. apalachicolae) and Suwannee River (Suwannee alligator snapping turtle, M. suwanniensis). The latter has been proposed as federally Threatened because of poaching, bycatch on fishing equipment, and nest predation throughout its limited geographic range (USFWS 2021b).

Nine microsatellite loci have been previously published for M. temminckii that were tested using samples from 8 river systems, where Hackler et al. (2007) found an overall moderate level of allelic diversity. However, Echelle et al. (2010) reported that, at the level of individual river systems, these 9 microsatellite loci had few alleles per locus and low levels of heterozygosity. These microsatellite loci demonstrated relatively low allelic variation, so there is a need for additional loci to provide greater power to detect fine-scale population genetic structure and perform kinship analyses. Additionally, better assessment of genetic structure can also be informative when attempting to reintroduce seized turtles to their appropriate drainages (Biello et al. 2021).

In the present study, we screened 60 new microsatellite loci to determine amplification in M. temminckii and cross-amplification in M. suwanniensis and Chelydra serpentina (eastern snapping turtle). We then characterized 45 of these loci for M. temminckii in the hopes of providing the tools necessary to pursue future population genetic studies in M. temminckii and other chelydrid species.

Methods. — From 2017 to 2019, we used partially submerged hoop nets (90-cm and 120-cm diameter) baited with fresh or frozen fish to capture M. temminckii at two adjacent oxbow lakes within the Pascagoula River drainage in George County, Mississippi. Blood (0.5 to 1 ml) was collected from the dorsal coccygeal vein of all captured M. temminckii using a 23-gauge, 2.5-cm needle and stored in SED buffer (Seutin et al. 1991). Total genomic DNA from 2 individuals was extracted using the DNeasy Tissue Kit (QIAGEN Inc) and sent to the Savannah River Ecology Lab Molecular Ecology Lab where they prepared an Illumina pair-end shotgun library for sequencing (Lance et al. 2013). PAL_FINDERv0.02.03 (Castoe et al. 2012) was used to identify di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentanucleotide microsatellite sequences (i.e., nucleotide repeat motifs) among the reads. Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky 1999) was used to develop primers for 942 potential microsatellite loci. We screened 60 penta-, tetra-, and trinucleotide loci, focusing on loci whose sequences appeared only 1 or 2 times within the sequence reads, to reduce the likelihood of targeting repetitive loci.

We initially screened the 60 loci on 5 M. temminckii, 3 M. suwanniensis (provided by D. Stevenson, H. Chandler, B. Stegenga, and K. Enge; Alapaha River, Echols County, Georgia), and 2 C. serpentina (Itawamba County, Mississippi) to determine which loci successfully amplified in each of the 3 species. Loci that amplified in each of the respective species were then tested in 53 M. temminckii, 14 M. suwanniensis, and 19 C. serpentina to assess variability in each locus. Genomic DNA was extracted from each individual using a DNeasy Tissue Kit, and amplifications of samples were conducted in a total volume of 12.5 µl using 8.445 µl of dH2O, 1.25 µl of 10× standard Taq (Mg-free) buffer (New England BioLabs), 0.25 µl of 2 mM dNTPs, 1 µl of 25 mM MgCl2, 0.08 units Taq polymerase (New England BioLabs), 0.20 µl of 10 mM forward tailed (Boutin-Ganache et al. 2001) and reverse primers, 0.075 µl of 1 µM labeled M-13 primer (Eurofins), and 1 µl of 20–50 ng of DNA template. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 35 cycles for 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 56°C, and 1 min at 72°C, with a final elongation of 10 min at 72°C. Microsatellite alleles were visualized on an acrylamide gel using a LI-COR 4300 DNA Analyzer and allele sizes were determined using GeneProfiler ver. 4.05 (LI-COR Inc, Lincoln, NE). We used the amplified fragments of the Lambda phage as a size standard (Wang et al. 2010).

GenAlEx 6.51 (Peakall and Smouse 2012) was used to calculate number of alleles (NA) and observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosity. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium were tested using the probability tests of GENEPOP on the web (Raymond and Rousset 1995; Rousset 2008), while we assessed the presence of null alleles using MICRO-CHECKER v. 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al. 2004). A sequential Bonferroni correction (Rice 1989) was used to adjust the alpha values for multiple comparisons.

Results and Discussion. — Sequence data for the loci isolated in the present study can be found in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive listed under BioProject accession PRJNA688648 and BioSample number SAMN17185309 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject). A total of 47 loci amplified for at least 1 of the 3 species (Table 1). Of these, 45 loci amplified for M. temminckii (7 monomorphic), 45 loci amplified for M. suwanniensis (32 monomorphic), and 40 loci amplified for C. serpentina (8 monomorphic). Two loci (Mtem038 and Mtem047) that amplified for C. serpentina and one locus (Mtem060) for M. suwanniensis require additional optimization by future users before they can be scored with confidence; these 3 loci are not considered monomorphic or polymorphic within this article.

Table 1. Characterization of 47 microsatellite loci isolated for the alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii), including the repeat motif and forward (F) and reverse (R) primer sequences. Forward primers are reported without the additional M13 tail. Amplification results for M. temminckii (Mtem), M. suwanniensis (Msuw), and Chelydra serpentina (Cser) are indicated as + (amplification) or – (no amplification).
Table 1.
Table 1. Continued.
Table 1.

Table 2 provides the number of alleles and observed and expected heterozygosity for each locus in each species. The averages across polymorphic loci are as follows: M. temminckii NA: 3.58 (range, 2–8), HO: 0.483 (range, 0.029–0.860), and HE: 0.455 (range, 0.029–0.762); M. suwanniensis NA: 2.67 (range, 2–5), HO: 0.220 (range, 0.000–0.385), and HE: 0.274 (range, 0.069–0.594); C. serpentina NA: 8.23 (range, 2–18), HO: 0.607 (range, 0.105–1.000), and HE: 0.661 (range, 0.100–0.911). Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium was violated for 2 loci in both M. temminckii (Mtem012 and Mtem054) and C. serpentina (Mtem021 and Mtem055). Six pairs of loci in M. temminckii exhibited linkage disequilibrium after a sequential Bonferroni correction: Mtem006/010, Mtem006/033, Mtem010/033, Mtem048/054, Mtem052/057, and Mtem057/060. No null alleles were detected for M. temminckii, but potential null alleles were identified at Mtem010, Mtem019, Mtem021, and Mtem055 for C. serpentina and Mtem032 for M. suwanniensis.

Table 2. Results of testing the 45 alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) microsatellite loci on 53 M. temminckii, 14 Suwannee alligator snapping turtles (M. suwanniensis), and 19 eastern snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina). For each locus, we report the number of alleles (NA), observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosity, and size range (in base pairs [bp]), including the 19 base pairs from the M13 tail added to the forward primer. — = no calculated value due to a monomorphic locus or a locus that did not amplify; * = loci that amplified but require additional optimization for confidence in genotyping. Loci that failed to amplify are listed as NA under size range.
Table 2.

We are in the process of using the polymorphic loci identified in the present study to assess patterns of population structure within M. temminckii across broad and fine spatial scales in the state of Mississippi. Some of these loci proved to be highly polymorphic in C. serpentina and should be useful in future population genetic studies of this species. Conversely, our loci were mostly monomorphic (71% of the loci that amplified) in M. suwanniensis, which may reflect its limited geographical range.

Acknowledgments

Our research was supported by funding from the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, as well as a National Geographic Early Career Grant and an American Museum of Natural History Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund awarded to L.P. We thank Stacey Lance (Savannah River Ecology Lab) for Illumina Sequencing and processing of reads and Mississippi IDeA Network of Biomedical Research Excellence for use of equipment. We also thank Gabrielle A. Berry, Grover J. Brown, and Lucas Haralson for assistance in the field and collection of tissue samples. All tissue samples were collected under scientific collecting permits MMNS #0421171, MMNS #0301182, and MMNS #0408191 and in accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol #17051106 from the University of Southern Mississippi.

LITERATURE CITED

  • Biello, R., Zampiglia, M., Corti, C., Deli, G., Biaggini, M., Crestanell, B., Delaugerre, M., Di Tizio, L., Leonetti, F.L., Casari, S., Olivieri, O., Pellegrino, F., Romano, A., Sperone, E., Hauffe, H.C., Trabalza-Marinucci, M., Bertorelle, G., and Canestrelli,D. 2021. Mapping the geographic origin of captive and confiscated Hermann's tortoises: a genetic toolkit for conservation and forensic analyses.Forensic Science International: Genetics51: 102447.
  • Boutin, I., Raposo, M., Raymond, M., and Deschepper,C.F. 2001. M-13 tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-size methods.Biotechniques31: 2428.
  • Castoe, T.A., Poole, A.W., De Koning, A.P.J., Jones, K.L., Tomback, D.F., Oyler-Mccance, S.J., Lance, S.L., Streicher, J.W., and Pollock,D.D. 2012. Rapid microsatellite identification from Illumina paired-end genomic sequencing in two birds and a snake.PLoS ONE7(
    2
    ): e30953.
  • Echelle, A.A., Hackler, J.C., Lack, J.B., Ballard, S.R., Roman, J., Fox, S.F., Leslie, D.M., JR., and Van Den Bussche,R.A. 2010. Conservation genetics of the alligator snapping turtle: cytonuclear evidence of range-wide bottleneck effects and unusually pronounced geographic structure.Conservation Genetics11: 13751387.
  • Gallardo-Alvarez, M.I., Lesher-Gordillo, J.M., Machkourm'rabet, S., Zenteno-Ruiz, C.E., Olivera-Gómez, L.D., Barragán-Vázquez, M.R., Ríos-Rodas, L., Valdés-Marín, A., Vázquez-López, H.G., and Arriaga-Weiss,S.L. 2019. Genetic diversity and population structure of founders from wildlife conservation management units and wild populations of critically endangered Dermatemys mawii.Global Ecology and Conservation19: e00616.
  • Grueber, C.E., Fox, S., Mclennan, E.A., Gooley, R.M., Pemberton, D., Hogg, C.J., and Belov,K. 2018. Complex problems need detailed solutions: harnessing multiple data types to inform genetic management in the wild.Evolutionary Applications12: 280291.
  • Hackler, J.C., Van Den Bussche, R.A., and Leslie,D.M.,JR. 2007. Characterization of microsatellite DNA markers for the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii.Molecular Ecology Notes7: 474476.
  • Lance, S.L., Love, C.N., Nunziata, S.O., O'bryhim, J.R., Scott, D.E., Flynn, R.W., and Jones,K.L. 2013. 32 species validation of a new Illumina paired-end approach for the development of microsatellites.PLOS ONE8(
    11
    ): e81853.
  • Lovich, J.E., Ennen, J.R., Agha, M., and Gibbons,J.W. 2018. Where have all the turtles gone, and why does it matter?BioScience68: 771781.
  • NatureServe. 2021. NatureServe Explorer: an online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1.
    Arlington, VA
    :
    NatureServe
    . http://explorer.natureserve.org (May 2021).
  • Peakall, R. and Smouse,P.E. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update.Bioinformatics28: 25372539.
  • Pierson, J.C., Coates, D.J., Oostermeijer, J.G.B., Beissinger, S.R., Bragg, J.G., Sunnucks, P., Schumaker, N.H., and Young,A.G. 2016. Genetic factors in threatened species recovery plans on three continents.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment14: 433440.
  • Pritchard, P.C.H. 1989. The Alligator Snapping Turtle: Biology and Conservation.
    Malabar, FL
    :
    Krieger Publishing Company
    , 152 pp.
  • Raymond, M. and Rousset,F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism.Journal of Heredity86: 248249.
  • Reed, R.N., Congdon, J., and Gibbons,J.W. 2002. The alligator snapping turtle [Macrochelys (Macroclemys) temminckii]: a review of ecology, life history, and conservation, with demographic analyses of the sustainability of take from wild populations.
    Report to: Division of Scientific Authority, US Fish and Wildlife Service
    .
  • Rhodin, A.G., Stanford, C.B., Van Dijk, P.P., Eisemberg, C., Luiselli, L., Mittermeier, R.A., Hudson, R., Horne, B.D., Goode, E.V., Kuchling, G., ET AL. 2018. Global conservation status of turtles and tortoises (order Testudines).Chelonian Conservation and Biology17: 135161.
  • Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests.Evolution43: 223225.
  • Rousset, F. 2008. Genepop'007: a complete re-implementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux.Molecular Ecology Resources8: 103106.
  • Rozen, S. and Skaletsky,H. 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.In:Misener,S. and Krawetz,S.A. (Eds.). Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols.
    Clifton, NJ
    :
    Humana Press
    , pp. 365386.
  • Selkoe, K.A. and Toonen,R.J. 2006. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers.Ecology Letters9: 615629.
  • Sethuraman, A., Mcgaugh, S.E., Becker, M.L., Chandler, C.H., Christiansen, J.L., Hayden, S., Leclere, A., Monson-Miller, J., Myers, E.M., Paitz, R.T., Refsnider, J.M., Vandewalle, T.J., and Janzen,F.J. 2014. Population genetics of Blanding's turtle (Emys blandingii) in the midwestern United States.Conservation Genetics15: 6173.
  • Seutin, G., White, B.N., and Boag,P.T. 1991. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analysis.Canadian Journal of Zoology69: 8290.
  • Spinks, P.Q., Thomson, R.C., and Shaffer,H.B. 2014. The advantages of going large: genome-wide SNPs clarify the complex population history and systematics of the threatened western pond turtle.Molecular Ecology23: 22282241.
  • Stanford, C.B., Iverson, J.B., Rhodin, A.G.J., Van Dijk, P.P., Mittermeier, R.A., Kuchling, G., Berry, K.H., Bertolero, A., Bjorndal, K.A., Blanck, T.E.G., ET AL. 2020. Turtles and tortoises are in trouble.Current Biology30: R721R735.
  • Thomas, T.M., Granatosky, M.C., Bourque, J.R., Krysko, K.L., Moler, P.E., Gamble, T., Suarez, E., Leone, E., Enge, K.M., and Roman,J. 2014. Taxonomic assessment of alligator snapping turtles (Chelydridae: Macrochelys), with the description of two new species from the southeastern United States.Zootaxa3786: 141165.
  • Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [ Rhodin,A.G.J.,Iverson,J.B.,Bour,R.,Fritz,U.,Georges,A.,Shaffer,H.B., and Van Dijk,P.P. ]. 2017. Turtles of the world: annotated checklist and atlas of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution, and conservation status. Eighth edition.In:Rhodin,A.G.J.,Iverson,J.B.,Van Dijk,P.P.,Saumure,R.A.,Buhlmann,K.A.,Pritchard,P.C.H., and Mittermeier,R.A. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs7: 1292.
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021a. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Threatened species status with Section 4(d) Rule for Alligator Snapping Turtle.Federal Register86: 6243462463.
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021b. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month petition finding and threatened species status with section 4(d) rule for Suwannee alligator snapping turtle.Federal Register86: 1081418034.
  • Van Oosterhout, C.V., Hutchinson, W.F., Wills, D.P.M., and Shipley,P. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data.Molecular Ecology4: 535538.
  • Wang, T.Y., Guo, L., and Zhang,J.H. 2010. Preparation of DNA ladder based on multiplex PCR technique.Journal of Nucleic Acids2010: 421803.
Copyright: © 2022 Chelonian Research Foundation 2022

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author

†The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Fish and Wildlife Service

Handling Editor: Peter V. Lindeman

Received: 06 Jan 2022
Accepted: 16 Feb 2022
  • Download PDF