Editorial Type: ARTICLES
 | 
Online Publication Date: 06 Jan 2025

Calipee Trade: A Pervasive Yet Under-recognized Threat to Softshell Turtles in South Asia

,
,
, and
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 153 – 160
DOI: 10.2744/CCB-1636.1
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

The illegal trade in meat and pets is a well-recognized conservation threat to South Asian tortoises and freshwater turtles. We highlight additional threats from the trade in turtle body parts, particularly in dried calipee of softshell turtles. Evidence from media-reported seizures, publicly available government records, and field-based information suggests that the illegal trade in calipee, which targets endangered softshell turtle species, is more pervasive than previously acknowledged. Between 2007 and January 2024, at least 5351.5 kg of dried calipee (equivalent to 133.8 tons to 246.2 tons of turtles) were seized from South Asia, with several large consignments (more than 500 kg) headed to international destinations, including Hong Kong, China. Given the lack of awareness and enforcement challenges in identifying this product, we expect that the seizures represent a very small percentage of the actual trade. Literature and field-based information suggest that this trade specifically targets endangered softshell turtle species such as Nilssonia gangetica, Nilssonia hurum, Nilssonia leithii, and Chitra indica, further highlighting the conservation concerns surrounding this cryptic trade. We urge the conservation community and law enforcement agencies across Asia, at both source sites and markets, to contribute toward creating a nuanced understanding of this trade and take active measures to mitigate the threat posed by calipee trade to endangered turtles in South Asia.

मांस और पालतू पशु व्यापार के लिए कछुओं और मीठे पानी के कछुओं की तस्करी एक सुस्थापित खतरा है। हम कछुए के शरीर के अंगों के व्यापार से होने वाले अतिरिक्त खतरों पर प्रकाश डालते हैं, विशेष रूप से सॉफ्ट-शेल्ड (नरम खोल) कछुओं के सूखे कैलीपी में, जिसे पूर्वी भारत में बाद या बादी के नाम से जाना जाता है। मीडिया द्वारा रिपोर्ट की गई जब्तियों, सार्वजनिक सरकारी रिकॉर्ड और फील्ड-आधारित जानकारी से पता चलता है कि कैलीपी का अवैध व्यापार, जिसे लुप्तप्राय सॉफ्ट-शेल्ड कछुओं की प्रजातियों से निकाला जाता है, पहले से पहचाने गए स्तर से कहीं अधिक व्यापक है। 2007 और जनवरी 2024 के बीच, दक्षिण एशिया से कम से कम 5351.5 किलोग्राम सूखा कैलीपी (133.8 टन से 246.2 टन कछुओं के बराबर) जब्त की गई थी, जिसमें कई बड़े खेप (500 किलोग्राम से अधिक) अंतरराष्ट्रीय गंतव्यों, जैसे हांगकांग और चीन, की ओर गये। जागरूकता की कमी और इस उत्पाद की पहचान करने में चुनौतियों के कारण, हमें विश्वास है कि जब्त की गई खेप वास्तविक व्यापार का एक बहुत छोटा प्रतिशत दर्शाती है। वैज्ञानिक साहित्य और फील्ड-आधारित जानकारी से पता चलता है कि यह व्यापार विशेष रूप से लुप्तप्राय सॉफ्ट-शेल्ड कछुओं की प्रजातियों जैसे कि निल्सोनिया गैंगेटिका, निल्सोनिया हुरम, निल्सोनिया लेथि और चित्रा इंडिका को लक्षित करता है, जो इस गुप्त व्यापार के संबंध में संरक्षण की चिंताओं को और अधिक उजागर करता है। हम वन्यजीव संरक्षण समुदाय और एशिया भर में कानून प्रवर्तन एजेन्सीस से, स्रोत स्थलों और गंतव्यों दोनों पर, आग्रह करते हैं कि वे इस व्यापार की बेहतर समझ विकसित करने में योगदान दें और दक्षिण एशिया में लुप्तप्राय कछुओं के लिए कैलीपी व्यापार द्वारा उत्पन्न खतरे को कम करने के लिए सक्रिय उपाय करें।

The riverine ecosystems of South Asia and its associated wetlands harbor a rich diversity of turtle species, many of which are endemic to the region. Notably the floodplains of the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Indus rivers, which originate from the Himalayas, as well as the rivers along the western coast of southern India have been identified as critical hotspots for turtle conservation (Ennen et al. 2021; Mittermeier et al. 2015). However, like in many other Asian regions, tortoises and freshwater turtles in these landscapes are facing severe exploitation for the trade in meat, eggs, shells, and live animals (van Dijk 2000; Cheung and Dudgeon 2006; Chen et al. 2009; Mendiratta et al. 2017). Studies from South Asia over the past decade have raised concerns about the massive scale of illegal trade in turtles, including many threatened species, for the meat and pet trade (Shamsur Rahman et al. 2013; Mendiratta et al. 2017; Ramya Roopa et al. 2024). Previous studies have revealed that although tortoises and hard-shell turtles such as the Indian star tortoise (Geochelone elegans, Vulnerable; IUCN 2024) and spotted pond turtle (Geoclemys hamiltonii, Endangered, IUCN 2024) are trafficked primarily for the pet trade (Chng 2014; D’Cruze et al. 2015; Leupen 2019), softshell turtle species such as the Indian flapshell turtle (Lissemys punctata, Vulnerable; IUCN 2024), Indian softshell turtle (Nilssonia gangetica, Endangered; IUCN 2024), Indian peacock softshell turtle (Nilssonia hurum, Endangered; IUCN 2024), Indian narrow-headed softshell turtle (Chitra indica, Endangered; IUCN 2024), and Leith’s softshell turtle (Nilssonia leithii, Critically endangered and restricted to southern peninsular India; IUCN 2024) are targeted for large regional meat markets (Mendiratta et al. 2017) and international markets in turtle body parts (Das 1990; Noureen and Khan 2007a, 2007b; Noureen 2009; Noureen et al. 2012). These traded body parts from turtles, including calipee, shells, and bones, are all known to have significant commercial value (Kolby 2021). This trade persists despite legal protection for many of these species through international treaties such as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and national laws, such as the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 of India, the Wildlife (Conservation and Security) Act, 2012 of Bangladesh, and provincial laws across Pakistan.

Among turtle body parts and products, calipee extraction and trade in particular has emerged as an important threat to freshwater turtles (Horne et al. 2012). Calipee is the cartilaginous tissue found inside the plastron of turtles and the outer margins of the carapace of softshell turtles (Kolby 2021) (see Fig. 1). Historically, the term calipee was primarily used in the context of sea turtles, such as green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas), that were harvested for the calipee trade (Stoddart 1976; Frazier 1980). However, it is currently also used in the context of freshwater turtles from the family Trionychidae (such as Nilssonia spp.). It is unclear if the more recent use of the term “calipee” for freshwater turtles is a result of a shift in source for the same markets or the emergence of a new market, or if alternative terms were used to describe this product earlier. This part is cut, boiled, and often dried before being traded, in sometimes enormous quantities, from South Asian countries to destinations such as Hong Kong, China, and other East Asian countries, for purported use in food consumption and traditional medicine (Noureen and Khan 2007a, 2007b; Das et al. 2010; Noureen et al. 2012) (Fig. 2). Although field-based researchers from various localities and regions in South Asia have reported the hunting of softshell turtles for the calipee trade, we understand little about the scale and nature of this trade and its impact on turtle populations. Through this article, we aim to bridge this gap by synthesizing media-reported seizures, literature records of calipee trade originating from South Asia, and our own field-based information from eastern India. We seek to shed light on what could potentially be a severe and under-recognized threat to South Asia’s most endangered freshwater turtles and make a case for more focused and systematic studies on this threat and its impacts.

Figure 1.Figure 1.Figure 1.
Figure 1. (A) The sections highlighted in gray depict the area of the carapace and plastron of softshell turtles, which has the cartilaginous calipee (Kolby 2021). (B) A dead and discarded body of an Indian softshell turtle Nilssonia gangetica after the removal of calipee. Illustrations courtesy of Arijit Chottopadhyay.

Citation: Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World’s Turtle and Tortoise Journal 23, 2; 10.2744/CCB-1636.1

Figure 2.Figure 2.Figure 2.
Figure 2. Photo of dried calipee with labeled parts. © Anirban Chaudhuri.

Citation: Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World’s Turtle and Tortoise Journal 23, 2; 10.2744/CCB-1636.1

METHODS

We conducted an exhaustive online search for media-reported seizures related to calipee trade using the Google search engine. Given the understudied nature of this trade, we used a trial-and-error approach to identify the most relevant keywords. Our final set of keywords included “turtle calipee”, “turtle calipee seized”, “turtle calipee seizure”, and “turtle cartilage seized”. Searches were also carried out in two regional languages, Hindi and Bengali, which are commonly used in our landscape of interest: (meaning turtle skin), (literal translation of “turtle calipee”), “कछुआ चिप्स” (literal translation of “turtle chips”), and “কচ্ছপের শুটকি” and “কাছিমের শুটকি” (meaning dried tortoise and turtle). We did not restrict the search to any specific timeline and scanned through all resultant pages. For India, we also searched through all newsletters (issue numbers 1–12) of the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB), which is the central body established by the government of India to counter wildlife crime, for any references to calipee trade (http://wccb.gov.in/Content/Newsletter.aspx). Given our limited access to information on this trade from other countries, we contacted country-specific experts on illegal turtle trade—2 researchers from Pakistan, 2 from Bangladesh, and 1 from China—to gather further information on calipee seizures. In addition, we searched for media-reported calipee seizures outside India using information from country-specific literature.

From the above, we retained only verified seizures. A seizure was considered verified if it was documented in government publications (e.g., WCCB newsletters), contained original photos/videos from the seizure incident, or provided descriptions of the seized product that matched turtle calipee. From each seizure report, we then extracted the information available on date of incident, location of seizure, location type, quantity, source of consignment, and destination of consignment. We attempted to estimate the weight of softshell turtles that might have been killed to supply the documented seizures. Given that no standardized conversions charts are available for this, we used Das and Singh (2009) and Das et al. (2010), which recorded that approximately 650 g of dried calipee can be extracted from 30 kg of softshell turtle (i.e., 46 kg of turtles provides 1 kg of dried calipee) and recently collected information from credible field-based sources that suggested that approximately 1 kg of dried calipee can be extracted from 25 kg of turtle (Ramya Roopa, unpubl. data). We believe that the differences in these estimates could be due to species involved, the size of individual animals used, and processing. We have therefore used these as the highest and lowest estimates to suggest a range for the weight of turtles involved in these seizures.

Additionally, we supplemented our understanding of the trade (particularly in terms of species involved and use of calipee) by synthesizing information from literature on the calipee trade. We used search terms such as “turtle calipee trade” and “turtle cartilage trade” in Google Scholar to find relevant literature. We reviewed papers on the illegal turtle trade in South Asia and examined all issues of the herpetological journal Hamadryad (1976–2018; available at https://hamadryad.org/index.php/journal/issue/view/3), which regularly publishes herpetological research from South Asia, for mentions of “turtle calipee”, “turtle cartilage,” or “turtle skin.”

RESULTS

Media-Reported Seizures. —

We recorded 30 seizures from India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, which reported at least 5351.5 kg of calipee seized, translating to an approximate of 133,787.5 kg to 246,169 kg of turtles. We recorded some of the largest calipee seizures in the region from Pakistan. In 2007, media recorded 2 seizures from Pakistan: 1 seizure at Karachi Airport involving 700 kg of calipee that was destined for Beijing, China, and another seizure in Peshawar, for which the quantity of confiscated calipee was not specified. In 2015 we recorded a 1900 kg calipee seizure at the Karachi seaport, the largest known seizure from the region, that was destined for Hong Kong. Both the 700 kg and 1900 kg consignments were labeled as “dried fish” products (Bhagwandas 2007; Ilyas 2015). In 2017 we recorded a consignment of 16 kg of calipee seized at Karachi Airport that was destined for Hong Kong. Overall, we documented 4 verified calipee seizures from Pakistan, totaling 2616 kg of calipee between 2007 and 2017 (see Table 1).

Table 1. Year-wise weight of calipee seizures made from South Asia. For India, we have used a combination of media articles, literature, field-based information, and data published by the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB 2022). All data for Pakistan and Bangladesh are based on media articles. The calculation for the quantity of dried calipee extracted per kg of turtle is based on literature (Das et al. 2010) and field-based information (Ramya Roopa, unpubl. data).
Table 1.

We found 3 calipee seizures from Bangladesh in the media—120 kg in 2011, 40 kg in 2015, and 8 kg in 2019. All seizures were made close to the international border with India, and the media reports indicated that the consignments were in transit from India to East Asia via Bangladesh. In addition to these, there was 1 seizure in Hong Kong in January 2024 consisting of 1400 kg of dried calipee, labeled as “dried seafood” that had originated from Bangladesh.

We recorded 22 seizures from India, which accounted for 1167.5 kg of calipee in the period from 2007 to January 2024. At least 12 of these seizures were made in the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP) in north India, which is likely to be one of the major sources of calipee. Experts quoted in media reports identified tributaries of the Yamuna and Chambal in UP as major collection landscapes (Qureshi 2018). Seven seizures, including 2 seizures of more than 200 kg (see Table 1), were from the districts along the international border with Bangladesh. News reports indicated that these consignments were being trafficked from India into Bangladesh. At least 6 seizures were made at railway stations or within trains, highlighting the exploitation of rail networks for calipee trafficking within India. Seizures in India and Bangladesh indicate trafficking from West Bengal into Bangladesh through land crossing via the district of Malda and Dakshin Dinajpur—as indicated by 6 seizures on the India side of the border and 3 on the Bangladesh side (see Fig. 3 and Table 1).

Figure 3.Figure 3.Figure 3.
Figure 3. Locations of recorded calipee seizures in South Asia between 2007 and January 2024. Shades and symbols in the map denote the number of seizure incidents and the weight of calipee seized (kg), aggregated by district. Seizures close to the international border between India and Bangladesh are represented and labeled in the inset map and marked with a box in the main map. Only countries involved in seizures as source, seizure, or destination locations are labeled on this map.

Citation: Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World’s Turtle and Tortoise Journal 23, 2; 10.2744/CCB-1636.1

It is hard to ascertain the species involved in these seizures. Images and even physical examination of the calipee seized often do not provide any information on the species involved. Further, the absence of good quality DNA in cartilage (calipee) as compared to that in bone or meat limits the use of genetic analysis for species identification (Kolby 2021). However, information available from literature (presented below) suggests that the trade disproportionately targets N. gangetica, N. hurum, C. indica, and N. leithii.

Literature References to Calipee Trade. —

Given the inconsistency in the use of terms corresponding to “calipee” and the lack of photographic evidence across publications, it is unclear exactly when this trade began. High volume of trade in “turtle body parts” from South Asia eastward to China, Hong Kong, and Japan has been recorded from the late 1970s and early 1980s (Moll 1982; Whitaker 1982; Das 1990); however, it is not clear if this included calipee. The earliest clear reports of commercial trade in calipee (confirmed by photographs) have come from Pakistan from the early 2000s (Noureen and Khan 2007a, 2007b), and this also provides the first indications of international trade in calipee.

In Pakistan, hunting of N. gangetica, N. hurum, and C. indica for their “plastron and chest pellicle”, which correspond to calipee as defined by Kolby (2021) has been recorded along the Indus River and its tributaries (Noureen and Khan 2007a, 2007b; Noureen 2009; Noureen et al. 2012). Specifically, calipee collected from sites in the provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, and Sindh were transported to major cities such as Karachi and Lahore through a network of middlemen for further export eastward to China (including over land to western China and over sea to Hong Kong) and other parts of East Asia (Baig 2006; Noureen and Khan 2007a, 2007b; Noureen 2009). According to Noureen (2009) most of the softshell turtle extraction in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and in Punjab provinces had been for turtle body parts (identified as “calipee” from images in her publications).

In Bangladesh, “badi” or the “cartilaginous flaps” of softshell turtles, primarily N. gangetica and N. hurum that die in holding centers, were sold to Japan and China, specifically Hong Kong (Das 1990). In addition, the Export Promotion Bureau of Bangladesh has recorded legal export in “fins” of turtles, among other products, such as meat, eggs, and live animals between the financial years 1977–1978 and 1985–1986 (Anonymous 1987); it is unclear, however, if “fins” refer to calipee and which species were part of this export.

In India, C. indica, N. gangetica, and N. hurum, all of which are endangered, are hunted for calipee (local name used in eastern India: “baad” or “badi”) across the Gangetic floodplains (Das and Singh 2009; Das et al. 2010). Similarly, N. leithii, faces severe exploitation in the Tungabhadra, Krishna, and Bhima drainages in southern India (Sirsi 2011; Das et al. 2014). Recent IUCN assessments of these species indicate a shift in trade from live animals to calipee across parts of South Asia (Ahmed et al. 2021; Das et al. 2021; Praschag et al. 2021). This trend is further corroborated by field-based information from parts of eastern India that reveal the targeted hunting of softshell turtles (Nilssonia spp. and C. indica) for calipee, while the meat is often locally consumed or discarded (Ramya Roopa and S. Dey, unpubl. data; F. Khudsar, pers. comm.). Likewise, extensive hunting of N. leithii for its calipee as documented in surveys between 2010 and 2011 (Sirsi 2011) has resulted in significant population decline resulting in expansion of hunting activities into new areas along the Bhima and Narmada rivers (S. Sirsi, pers. comm.).

We found no evidence for the use of other softshell turtle species from South Asia in the calipee trade from our literature review. However, it is unclear if this represents a gap in the literature, or if other species are indeed not used for this trade. It can be argued that in the case of the black softshell turtle (Nilssonia nigricans, Critically Endangered; IUCN 2024), which is morphologically similar to other Nilssonia species found in the trade and present in the same landscape, there may be a gap in the literature given the rarity and restricted range of this species. Literature records and field-based information also do not indicate the use of L. punctata for the calipee trade, which is otherwise one of the most common and most trafficked softshell turtle species in the region (Mendiratta et al. 2017). However, it is possible that as populations of large-bodied softshell turtles decline, cartilaginous plastral parts of L. punctata may be mixed in to cater to the demand.

The ultimate uses and markets for calipee appear to be in food and medicinal products in destination countries such as China (especially Hong Kong), Japan, Vietnam, Taiwan, and Korea (Das 1990; Noureen and Khan 2007a, 2007b; Das and Singh 2009; Noureen 2009; Das et al. 2010; Noureen et al. 2012). Many turtle-based products popular in East Asia have been associated with turtle body parts. These include traditional medicines made from turtle shells (carapace and plastron), such as “Biejia” and “Gui-Ban” (Moll 1982), “Guijia” and “Guijiajiao” (Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission 2020), and “Guilinggao” (Chen et al. 2009). Turtle body parts are also used in the preparation of “Suppon” cuisines in Japan. However, it is unclear to us if and how many of these products use softshell turtle calipee, and how much of that is sourced from wild populations in South Asia, as opposed to turtle farms in China and other countries.

DISCUSSION

In this paper, we aim to alert law enforcement agencies and the broader conservation community to an under-recognized yet potentially severe threat to softshell turtles in South Asia. Our compiled evidence—seizure data, field-based information, and literature review—indicates that this threat has been affecting some of our most endangered softshell turtles for more than 20 years, i.e., at least since the early 2000s, if not earlier. This threat adds to the repertoire of other threats facing these species in the region, such as habitat loss and alteration due to dams and barrages, siltation, and aquatic pollution (Das and Singh 2009) and loss of nesting habitat to sand mining (Nair and Krishna 2013) and riverbed cultivation (Tripathi 2017).

Our seizure data alone indicate a substantial trade in turtle calipee from South Asia (India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan) to international destinations such as Hong Kong, China, and other parts of East Asia between 2007 and 2024. Given that seizures represent only a fraction of illegal wildlife trade (Sharma et al. 2014) because of variability in detection and media reporting, the recorded seizure volumes are likely to be a gross underestimation. The problem of detection is particularly severe for calipee, as it is commonly traded in its dried form and frequently mislabeled as “buffalo horn” (Horne et al. 2012) or “dried fish skin” (Kanwal and Khan 2018). In 3 of the largest consignments recorded in our data (700 kg, 1400 kg, and 1900 kg of calipee), the dried calipee was declared as dried fish/seafood. This deceptive labeling is likely a widespread strategy aimed at evading detection by law enforcement agencies. Moreover, many law enforcement agencies may struggle to recognize this product as contraband during the scanning process. Additionally, in at least 1 seizure in India, the reported weight of the seized calipee was only part of the actual consignment, as some of the accused managed to escape with more than half of the consignment when intercepted by law enforcement agencies (S. Dey, pers. comm.).

Our literature review and field-based information suggest that the calipee trade might be targeting some of the most endangered and range-restricted softshell turtle species in South Asia, the Nilssonia spp. and C. indica. This is a serious concern from an ecological perspective, giving rise to an urgent need to investigate the extent of this trade and its demographic impacts on wild populations. Given the indications that exploitation may be causing significant population declines in these species in certain areas, we recommend a systematic effort to identify, monitor, and protect existing populations of softshell turtles at the earliest.

Little information is available regarding the use, demand, and markets for calipee that we could access. Based on literature, we found many turtle-based products for sale online; however, it was difficult to determine the specific turtle body parts used in their manufacture. Investigating the calipee trade in Hong Kong, which clearly emerged as a destination for calipee sourced from South Asia, might serve as a crucial starting point in understanding the wider demand and market for this product. It is especially important to understand this demand in the context of the turtle-farming industry (Haitao et al. 2007) and investigate why body parts of endangered turtles are being illegally sourced from the wild, despite the existence of these farms.

Despite its extent, and the potential negative impacts on these endangered species, the calipee trade has largely escaped the attention of the conservation and research community, leaving major gaps in our understanding of it. We found that the lack of consistent vocabulary and definitions have hindered consolidation of even existing information. We recommend that moving forward there be a focused effort to collect specific information on calipee trade from across the trade chain to help confirm the species involved, the scale of the trade, source locations, modus operandi, the actors involved, and the possible markets driving the demand for this product. This would help create a nuanced understanding of the trade, which would in turn help in designing data-driven responses and interventions to mitigate this threat.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yik Hei Sung, Shashwat Sirsi, Samiul Mohsanin, Rupali Ghosh, Faiyaz Khudsar, and Nirmal Kulkarni for sharing their valuable insights on calipee trade with us. We thank Nachiket Kelkar for his guidance on collecting information from field sources and Akshay Kumar for assisting in the same. We thank Fahim Zaman and Fahad Malik for helping us understand the legislation protecting the species of turtles in Bangladesh and Pakistan, respectively. We thank Dr. Arijit Chottopadhyay for illustrations used in Fig. 1. We also thank the reviewers, the editor, and Anand Osuri for their suggestions that have greatly helped us improve the manuscript.

LITERATURE CITED

Copyright: © 2024 Chelonian Research Foundation 2024
word
Figure 1.
Figure 1.

(A) The sections highlighted in gray depict the area of the carapace and plastron of softshell turtles, which has the cartilaginous calipee (Kolby 2021). (B) A dead and discarded body of an Indian softshell turtle Nilssonia gangetica after the removal of calipee. Illustrations courtesy of Arijit Chottopadhyay.


Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Photo of dried calipee with labeled parts. © Anirban Chaudhuri.


Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Locations of recorded calipee seizures in South Asia between 2007 and January 2024. Shades and symbols in the map denote the number of seizure incidents and the weight of calipee seized (kg), aggregated by district. Seizures close to the international border between India and Bangladesh are represented and labeled in the inset map and marked with a box in the main map. Only countries involved in seizures as source, seizure, or destination locations are labeled on this map.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author

Handling Editor: Chris R. Shepherd

Received: 16 Apr 2024
Accepted: 23 Jul 2024
  • Download PDF