Editorial Type: ARTICLES
 | 
Online Publication Date: 06 Jan 2025

Arsenic Accumulation in Sonora Mud Turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) in an Unusual Freshwater Food Web

,
,
,
,
, and
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 236 – 245
DOI: 10.2744/CCB-1637.1
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Montezuma Well is an unusual fishless, spring-fed, desert wetland in central Arizona. Water in the wetland is naturally enriched with > 100 µg/l dissolved geogenic arsenic (As) and supports a simple aquatic food web dominated by a small number of endemic invertebrate species that achieve high abundances. Previous studies of As among various environmental compartments and organisms in Montezuma Well did not include omnivorous Sonora Mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) despite their potential importance in the As cycle by virtue of their substantial biomass and role as top predators. We measured As concentrations in water, sediment, and organisms (macrophytes, amphipods, insects, leeches, and turtles) representing a range of trophic levels in order to document the importance of turtles at the apex of the Montezuma Well food web and in the As cycle. Concentrations of As in turtles varied according to tissue type. The greatest values (up to 26.77 mg/kg dry weight) were in the scutes of 1 of our oldest turtles (31.5 yrs). These elevated concentrations may be due to the affinity of As to react with sulfur in the keratin of scutes, and therefore might reflect duration of exposure in long-lived turtles. Although As concentrations generally tend to decrease when moving up to higher trophic levels in a food web, our results were different. Relatively elevated concentrations reported in sediments by us and a previous study declined in plant samples as expected. Amphipod concentrations increased but then decreased again in 3 of their invertebrate predators. Arsenic concentrations in endemic leeches were extremely elevated with a mean value of 72.2 mg/kg. The mean concentration of As in turtles was 7.08 mg/kg across tissue types and was greater than the plants or invertebrates they eat, with the notable exception of leeches, which have been proposed to be part of their diet.

Arsenic (As) is the 20th most abundant element on earth. It is found in several forms and compounds in nature, some inorganic and others organic, as a consequence of biotransformation through its interaction with living organisms (Zhang et al. 2022). Some environments have unusually elevated concentrations of As, including various mine sites, coal-burning plants, agricultural areas treated with pesticides, and some marine environments (Kubota et al. 2002; Burger et al. 2009; Haskins et al. 2017). Some freshwater habitats are also in contact with natural deposits of As; dissolution of As from these deposits results in elevated concentrations of the metalloid in water. When As is released in the environment and enters the biogeochemical cycle, it is persistent, changing form only through reactions with other elements and compounds including via biomethylation. More than 300 arsenic species are known, including the organic forms of methylated arsenicals, thiolated arsenicals, arsenosugars, and arsenolipids, along with inorganic forms that include arsenite [As(III)] and arsenate [As(V)] (Eisler 1988; Zhang et al. 2022).

Arsenic is ubiquitous in living tissue where the element is subject to numerous chemical reactions related to metabolism. Despite a widespread distribution in living organisms, As concentrations are usually < 1 mg/kg fresh weight in terrestrial and freshwater flora and fauna (Eisler 1988). The effects of As in organisms are variable as is the relative toxicity of its inorganic oxidation states and organic forms to most organisms in aquatic ecosystems. Inorganic arsenicals are reported to be more toxic than organic arsenicals, and trivalent inorganic forms are more toxic than pentavalent forms. However, the metalloid can be highly toxic and carcinogenic in both inorganic and organic forms. Our understanding of arsenic toxicity at subacute levels in wildlife is limited because of a lack of research on specific symptoms and toxic effects on nonmammalian species (Jamwal et al. 2023). Organisms exposed to As excrete it in several ways through different organs. About 80% of inorganic As and organic metabolites ingested by animals (assumed to be domestic mammals) is absorbed and metabolized in the liver and then excreted through urine and feces, but under chronic exposure, it is deposited in liver, kidney, and skin (Roy et al. 2013). Arsenic concentrations have been reported in many different animal tissues (Fujihara et al. 2003) including liver, muscle, kidney, bone, nails, and blood (Godley et al. 1998; Kubota et al. 2003; Cochran et al. 2018). For vertebrates, several reports have documented notable elevated concentrations of As (e.g., Fujihara et al. 2003; Dovick et al. 2015; Quintela et al. 2019).

Organisms can be exposed to As from water, dust, sediments (both directly from ingestion and indirectly from dermal contact), and food sources (Seltzer and Berry 2005; Foust et al. 2016). Concentrations of As in tissues tend to diminish in food webs moving upward toward top consumers (Kubota et al. 2003; Foust et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2022) via As transformations within the food web (Maeda et al. 1990; Foust et al. 2016; Ghosh et al. 2022). For example, in sea turtles, As concentrations are orders of magnitude lower compared to primary producers in the same habitat (Kubota et al. 2003).

Arsenic concentrations have been widely studied in various tissues of marine turtles, but less so in freshwater turtles and tortoises (Table 1). In general, As accumulates in turtle muscle (organic forms of As), liver, kidney, and bone, including turtle shells (Berry et al. 2001; Fujihara et al. 2003; Agusa et al. 2008). Organic forms of As such as arsenobetaine have been found in muscle and liver, while other methylated species of As have been reported in the liver and kidneys. Biomethylation represents a detoxification mechanism for inorganic arsenicals in organisms (Eisler 1988). Despite the toxicity of As, no evidence indicates that it is related to mortality in the turtles studied (Saeki et al. 2000; Agusa et al. 2008; Haskins et al. 2017). However, evidence exists of diminished metabolism in organisms with excessive burdens of As (Cochran et al. 2018). Still others suggest that As competes with phosphorus for basic cellular functions (Zhang et al. 2022).

Table 1. Arsenic concentrations reported in turtle tissues from around the world. The list is representative, not exhaustive, and is sorted alphabetically by species, and within species, by arsenic levels, highest to lowest.
Table 1.

Contamination of surface water bodies and groundwater aquifers by naturally derived As is common in the western United States (Welch et al. 2000). One such site is Montezuma Well (MW), a natural wetland in central Arizona. MW is model system for studying the fate of As in food webs because it is an isolated ecosystem, physiochemically stable, and As-rich, and has a simple and direct aquatic food web (Foust et al. 2016; Drost et al. 2021b). In addition to other unusual properties of MW (described in more detail below), its water has a significant concentration of geogenic As present primarily as inorganic arsenate [As(V)] (> 100 µg l−1; Foust et al. 2004), 10 times greater than the current EPA maximum contaminant level for arsenic in drinking water (10 µg l−1). This concentration of As is still below concentrations that are acutely toxic to most plants and animals, but greater than concentrations (19–48 µg/l) that have been reported to cause chronic effects in various aquatic organisms (Eisler 1988). Furthermore, MW served as a source of irrigation and drinking water for the prehistoric Sinagua people who inhabited the area from AD 700 to AD 1450, when they abruptly abandoned the area, leaving behind elaborate cliff dwellings that are today protected as part of Montezuma Castle National Monument. One study (Senanayake 2005) suggested that chronic As poisoning may have been one reason that previous inhabitants moved away from the area of the Well.

Our objective was to survey the concentration of As in turtles living in MW, an organism that was not included in the food web analysis of an earlier study (Foust et al. 2016). Omnivorous Sonora mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) are the top predators and dominant biomass in the MW food web. This omnivorous turtle genus has been identified as important to the regulation of ecosystem dynamics in lentic systems (Aresco et al. 2015). Sonora mud turtles were reported to eat the leeches (Senanayake 2005) that were previously considered to be the top predator in the MW food web (Foust et al. 2016). Given that turtles were not included in that earlier study, their role in the As cycle in this simple, direct food chain is as yet undescribed. Using data on the estimated population size of K. sonoriense from 1983 to 2015 (Drost et al. 2021b) and data on body weight (Drost et al. 2021a) we estimated that biomass ranged from 21.4 (SD = 5.3) to 319.9 (SD = 107.0) kg/ha during this time. These are substantial values when compared to other organisms (Congdon et al. 1986; Lovich et al. 2018) and suggest an important role for turtles in the As cycle.

In this preliminary study, we evaluate the As trophic pathways leading to the Sonora mud turtle and compare them to As concentrations reported in other turtles and tortoises. We measured As in water, sediments, and various other organisms that represent different trophic levels of the MW ecosystem. Our results provide only the second analysis of the environmental and biological sources, sinks, and accumulation pathways for arsenic at this unique wetland (Foust et al. 2016), but the first one to include K. sonoriense. Concentrations of As have been evaluated for this species in only 1 previous study, from a low-As environment elsewhere in Arizona, where As concentrations in turtles were less than 1 mg/kg wet weight (King et al. 1996). Numerous plant and algal species have been shown to bioaccumulate As from their environment to concentrations that greatly exceed those in surrounding water and sediment (Chen and Folt 2000; Meharg and Hartley‐Whitaker 2002), including MW (Foust et al. 2016), and we wanted to understand how long-lived turtles at MW accumulate and respond to chronic As exposure.

METHODS

Study Site. —

Montezuma Well is a deep, spring-fed sinkhole pond in the Verde River valley in Yavapai County in central Arizona (lat 34.649, long −111.752). The Well formed from a collapsed travertine spring dome in the calcareous Verde Formation that covers much of the floor of the Verde Valley. The structure of the Well is a large, bowl-shaped depression, with 15–20-m-high slopes and cliffs surrounding a deep, nearly circular pool that has diameters of about 90 m and 110 m at its narrowest and widest points, with a total surface area of 0.76 ha. The elevation of the water surface of the pond is about 1085 m. The bottom of the pool has a near-shore shelf that extends out 8–12 m from shore at depths of less than 1 m to about 3.5 m, then drops precipitously in the center of the pool to more than 15 m (Konieczki and Leake 1997; Blinn 2008).

The underground spring feeding MW has a high and relatively constant discharge that averages 0.062 m3/sec (62 l/sec), or about 5400 m3 per day (mean daily discharge from 1977 to 1992, from Konieczki and Leake 1997), though water flow at the surface is nearly imperceptible. Little variation is seen in water level either seasonally or from year to year, because of the elevation of the outlet at the southeast margin of the pool, where water flows through an underground cave system to adjacent Wet Beaver Creek. Water temperatures follow a consistent seasonal pattern within a narrow range from 18°C in winter to 26°C in late summer. Because of the high spring volume flowing through limestone and volcanic rock layers, the water in the Well has extraordinarily elevated concentrations of mineral compounds, particularly calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, and arsenic (Cole and Barry 1973; Konieczki and Leake 1997). The levels of As in the MW water have been attributed to groundwater contact with metamorphic Precambrian rock layers associated with the Black Hills that bound the south side of the Verde Valley (Foust et al. 2007).

Although dissolved oxygen levels may be near 100% in the surface waters, the elevated bicarbonate concentrations in the water have resulted in very high dissolved CO2 concentrations, such that fish, amphibians, and many aquatic invertebrates cannot survive in MW waters. This has resulted in a depauperate aquatic invertebrate fauna that includes at least 8 species endemic to the Well (Blinn and Sanderson 1989; Blinn 2008). In the late spring and summer, the shallower waters around the margins of the Well develop a dense growth of aquatic macrophytes, dominated by the endemic pondweed Potamogeton montezumawellensis (Blinn 2008; Ricketson et al. 2018). The abundant amphipod Hyalella montezuma forms the zooplankton foundation of the food web, supporting several dominant aquatic invertebrates including a predaceous leech (Motobdella montezuma; endemic), a water scorpion (Ranatra montezuma; endemic), damselfly (Telebasis salva), and giant water bug (Belostoma bakeri).

Because of the surrounding cliffs and the underground outflow of the water, the Well is a strongly isolated system for the turtles and its other aquatic fauna. This results in lifelong exposure of the aquatic biota to As and other minerals.

Sample Preparation and Analysis. —

Samples of water, sediment, plants, and animal tissues exposed to As were collected from 2010 to 2012. Because of the stable environment at Montezuma Well (Boucher et al. 1984) As chemistry is expected to vary little annually. Total dissolved As was measured in acidified water samples (2% HNO3) by inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Instruments were calibrated daily with National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards, and standards spiked into water samples were used to monitor for matrix interference. Nonacidified anaerobic water samples were collected for determination of As redox speciation by high-performance liquid chromatography interfaced with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (HPLC-ICP-MS) (Kulp et al. 2014; Dovick et al. 2015). Sediment samples were extracted with 100 mM K2HPO4 to estimate adsorbed and potentially bioavailable As concentrations (Keon et al. 2001; Kulp et al. 2006), and As in the extracts was measured with ICP-MS.

No turtles were sacrificed for this study. Turtles that died of natural causes were collected when found and dissected to obtain tissue samples for analysis. Target tissues included scutes, bones, liver, and muscle. Biological samples were stored at −18°C. Prior to processing in the lab, turtle tissue, scutes, and other biological samples in this study were thawed, rinsed with deionized water to remove sediment and debris, weighed to obtain the wet weight, and then lyophilized for 48 hr and reweighed to obtain a dry weight. Biological samples were acid digested by refluxing (1:1 HCl:HNO3) on a hotplate at 50°C for up to 5 d until samples were completely dissolved. The acid was then evaporated (70°C) and the residue reconstituted in 10 ml of 2% HNO3 and filtered (0.45 µm) before As analysis with ICP-MS. Arsenic concentrations were normalized to sample dry weight (dw).

Arsenic concentrations for 2 of the 6 turtles analyzed were also provided by the Michigan State University, Diagnostic Center for Population and Animal Health. Samples were dried overnight in a 75°C oven. Dried tissues were then digested in concentrated nitric acid in a 95°C oven for 4 hr. The digested samples were diluted with MQ water to 100× the dried tissue mass.

Analytical Methods. —

Total As analyses for all samples (Kulp et al. 2024) were conducted using an Agilent 7900 ICP-MS (Agilent Technologies Inc, Santa Clara, CA). Arsenic speciation measurements in water samples were performed by interfacing the ICP-MS with an Agilent 1260 HPLC (Agilent Technologies) equipped with a BioRad PRP-X100 ion exchange column and 20 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) eluent (1.5 ml/min; Dovick et al. 2015). Measured values were confirmed by internal standards and matrix spikes and demonstrated > 94% recovery of added As concentrations.

For those samples sent to Michigan State University, elemental analysis followed the method of Wahlen et al. (2005), using an Agilent 7900 ICP/MS (Agilent Technologies). An aliquot of each diluted tissue digest and calibration standard was diluted 20-fold with a solution containing 0.5% EDTA and Triton X-100, 1% ammonium hydroxide, 2% butanol, and 5 ppb of scandium and 7.5 ppb of germanium, rhodium, indium, and bismuth as internal standards. Standards were from Inorganic Ventures (Christiansburg, VA). NIST (Gaithersburg, MD) Bovine Liver and Mussel standards were used as controls. A second source calibration check standard from Alfa Aesar (Tewksbury, MA) was also used. Because of small sample sizes, we calculated a mean value for some samples.

Although we evaluate our results against those of Foust et al. (2016), differences in sample and species collection, handling, processing, and analysis between our studies allow only general comparisons and contrasts.

Necropsies. —

No turtles were sacrificed for this study. Two adult turtles were found dead at the study site in August and November 2015, and they were sent to the U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center for necropsy and further analysis (Lovich et al. 2024). Following necropsy both turtles were sent to the Diagnostic Center for Populations and Animal Health at Michigan State University for elemental analysis. Four other dead turtles (2 adult males and 2 adult females) also provided tissue for As determination in the TRK lab at Binghamton University.

RESULTS

Arsenic Concentrations in Montezuma Well. —

As shown in Table 2, 8 surface water samples were obtained at various locations around MW and had total As concentrations ranging from 108.52 to 123.99 mg/l with a mean of 114.25 mg/l (SD = 5.26). These total As concentrations were consistent with the value of 110 mg/kg reported by Foust et al. (2016). Arsenic in the surface water was present in the pentavalent [As(V)] oxidation state, with no arsenite [As(III)] detected. We obtained 6 submerged sediment samples from the shallow shelf around the perimeter of MW with phosphate extractable As concentrations ranging from 2.71 to 13.20 mg/kg and a mean of 8.99 mg/kg (SD = 3.59). Three submerged aquatic plant samples ranged from 3.52 to 5.38 mg/kg with a mean of 4.37 (SD = 0.94). Five leech samples had As concentrations ranging from 38.07 to 115.09 mg/kg and a mean of 72.18 mg/kg (SD = 29.48). A pair each of damselflies, water scorpions, and amphipods (Table 2) were characterized by As concentrations ranging from 1.83 to 17.01 mg/kg and a mean of 6.35 (SD = 6.34). The values of amphipods were almost an order of magnitude greater than for the 2 arthropods.

Table 2. Arsenic concentrations in Montezuma Well water, biological, and sediment samples. Water concentrations are presented in mg/l, and other samples are mg/kg dry weight. Note there is one sample value (for crayfish) from Beaver Creek, adjacent to Montezuma Well and downstream of the Well outlet.
Table 2.

Arsenic concentrations in K. sonoriense measured across all tissue types (Table 3) ranged from 0.91 to 26.77 mg/kg with a mean of 7.09 mg/kg (SD = 8.78), not including necropsied turtles sent to Michigan State University that ranged from 0.84 to 9.88 mg/kg (Table 2). Concentrations varied with tissue type and age. Muscle As concentrations ranged from 0.84 to 11.20 mg/kg (n = 6), while values for bone ranged from 0.91 to 2.35 (n = 2) and values for scutes ranged from 17.9 to 26.8 mg/kg (n = 2). A single liver sample measured 2.56 mg/kg, and another bone and scute sample combined measured 2.76 mg/kg. The highest As concentrations we observed (11.2 mg/kg dry weight of muscle and 26.8 mg/kg of scute) were in a male estimated to be 31.5 yrs old. In contrast, an adult female estimated to be 9.3 yrs of age had a concentration of only 0.84 mg/kg dry weight in muscle.

Table 3. Arsenic levels in different tissue types in Sonora mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) from Montezuma Well, Yavapai County, Arizona, in mg/kg dry weight. Code is the individual identifying mark for each turtle (except that UNM = unmarked), Age is calculated based on known long-term recaptures. Straight-line carapace length (CL) is given in mm. Samples processed by Michigan State University, Diagnostic Center for Population and Animal Health are marked with an asterisk.
Table 3.

Necropsies. —

Two dead specimens were bloated when found in August and November 2015, and the specimen collected in November showed some reddened areas of skin. Neither specimen showed any evidence of recent trauma. The cause of death in both turtles was attributed to emaciation. Virus cultures in both turtles were negative; virus cultures included cultures of the brains for West Nile virus and related arboviruses, and cultures of the livers and kidneys for ranaviruses. The carcasses were considered too decomposed to attempt bacterial cultures. Muscles of male turtle BIN and subadult female JMV contained arsenic levels of 9.88 and 0.84 mg/kg (dry weight), respectively.

DISCUSSION

Arsenic concentrations in turtle tissues have been studied mainly in marine species (Table 1). When As concentration in tissues (sum of all tissues) are compared between marine turtles and nonmarine turtles (tortoises and freshwater turtles), As in the former has a broader range (0.097–165 mg/kg) compared with nonmarine turtles (0.01–10.9 mg/kg). When midranges were calculated from Table 1, freshwater turtles had an order of magnitude lower As concentration than marine species. In clean open marine waters, total arsenic is 0.5–3 μg/l, with a mean of 1.7 μg/l (Neff 2002), while the typical arsenic concentration in unpolluted freshwater ranges from less than 1 to 10 μg/l (Wang et al. 2022).

It is interesting to note that one of the greatest As muscle concentrations we observed (11.2 mg/kg dw) was in a male K. sonoriense estimated to be 31.5 yrs old, while an adult female estimated to be only 9.3 yrs of age had a much lower value (0.84 mg/kg) in muscle. Duration of chronic exposure to As, along with As concentration in the food web, affects the concentration of the metalloid in the tissues of organisms. Long-lived animals such as K. sonoriense, estimated to live more than 40 yrs (Stone et al. 2022), may accumulate significant concentrations of contaminants over time (Rowe 2008). The greatest concentrations (up to 26.8 mg/kg) we observed were in the scutes of 1 of our oldest animals. It is possible that these concentrations may be because of the affinity of As to react with sulfur in the keratin (Alibardi 2005; Mandal 2017) of their scutes over time.

The fate of assimilated arsenic, once it enters the aquatic food web, is not well established. Several reports have documented arsenic biodiminution in the upper trophic levels of freshwater food webs, particularly those that are dominated by fish (Wagemann et al. 1978; Chen and Folt 2000; Mason et al. 2000). Montezuma Well supports a rather unique, but simple and stable, ecosystem. Primary productivity in the MW water column occurs in the form of microphytoplankton (< 5 µm cell diameter), which bloom during spring and summer in the more stable thermal conditions in MW (Boucher et al. 1984). The MW food web also includes a depauperate community of aquatic plants (macrophytes) and mostly endemic invertebrates including predatory leeches, which have among the highest arsenic concentrations, 2810 mg/kg, ever reported for organisms according to Foust et al. (2016). Leeches may accumulate As in the mucus that they secrete as a detoxification mechanism. With their mucus covering washed away, As in leach tissues is only between 45.5 mg/kg in the form of sulfur-coordinated arsenic As(III)-tris-glutathione according to Foust et al. (2016).

The Sonora mud turtle (Kinosternon sonoriense) sits at the top of the MW aquatic food web as an abundant omnivore (Ernst and Lovich 2009). Part of their diverse diet supposedly includes leeches (Senanayake 2005), along with other aquatic invertebrates and opportunistic prey items (Lovich et al. 2010). Leech consumption would expose turtles to As that could accumulate to the high concentrations seen in scutes as our analytical results (Table 3) and Berry et al. (2001) suggest. Arsenic can also accumulate in the keratin of turtle claws (Haskins et al. 2017; Cochran et al. 2018), but we did not sample claws.

Approximately 85% of phosphorus in living vertebrates is contained in bone, and turtles can contain 43% bone by body mass (Coe et al. 1979) due to their bony shell. As such, there is potential for turtles to bioconcentrate As in bone, replacing phosphorus (Akbal et al. 2014). The low concentrations we observed in bone suggest this is not happening to a significant degree with turtles at MW. In contrast, Senanayake (2005) analyzed the ancient bones of animals from museum collections, including K. sonoriense, that were eaten by Native Americans at MW when the site was still occupied (up to about the year 1450). They estimated a median As concentration of 188 mg/kg (range 79.91–365.05 mg/kg) for turtle bones, values about 2 orders of magnitude greater than ours. However, they noted “The sample preparation was carried out to minimize the contamination by surface arsenic. Precautions were taken for this because, in the past, a chemical, containing arsenic may have been used to protect the artifacts from insects.” Given that such treatment is commonplace for museum specimens (Mithander et al. 2017), the concentrations presented should be considered with caution. Indeed, when they analyzed modern turtle bones from the Verde Valley, they found a median As concentration of 2.035 mg/kg (range 1.43–2.64 mg/kg), values almost identical to ours. The high concentrations Senanayake (2005) reported in ancient turtle bones led them to conclude that the Native Americans that lived at Montezuma Well and ate turtles suffered from chronic arsenic poisoning.

The dynamics of As in the MW food web have been studied previously (Foust et al. 2007, 2016), but turtles were not included as the top aquatic predator for most of the invertebrates from the well. Our results differ from the previously documented trend of diminished As moving up the food web from the bottom, with the notable exception of leeches observed in both our study and that of Foust et al. (2016). The concentrations we observed differ from those of Foust et al. in several regards. Only general comparisons and contrasts between our data and theirs are possible because of differences in As extraction techniques, sample collection, and trophic levels used. It is interesting to note that concentrations for turtles are greater than for their arthropod prey species but still much lower than that for leeches. A major difference between the studies is that we did not measure As in plankton and Foust et al. (2016) did not measure As in aquatic vascular plants. The plankton provide food for the amphipods that do not eat vascular plants. The amphipods would seem to be too small for the turtles to eat, but Hulse (1974) noted that K. sonoriense elsewhere in Arizona eats ostracods that are about the same size as amphipods. We did not include water bugs (Belostma bakeri) in our sampling either, which are another potential prey item for mud turtles.

Nevertheless, our results document how the top predator of the MW has relatively low As in its tissues compared to some of the lower trophic levels. In our small sample, turtle scutes were the tissues with the greatest concentrations (Table 3), compared to muscle and bone. Another important finding is that a very old turtle (31.5 yrs old) had the greatest As concentration (27.8 mg/kg in scute) among all samples. This also demonstrates that a turtle in MW could survive at least 31 yrs in the As-rich aquatic habitat. We estimate that some turtles in MW are at least 39 yrs old based on mark-recapture data starting in the 1980s.

We did not identify the organic species of the As present at the site. According to Foust et al. (2016) As(III)-tris-glutathione [(GS)3As(III)] and arsenobetaine are both present in the invertebrate tissues in MW, with the sulfur-coordinated (GS)3As(III) being the only As form in leeches (Foust et al. 2016) and a combination of (GS)3As(III) and aresenobetaine in the insect fauna of the Well. It would be interesting to understand which of these organic forms of As are in K. sonoriense tissues, because turtles likely feed on all aquatic macroinvertebrates and vascular plants in MW as is characteristic of mud turtles (Hulse 1974; Macip-Ríos et al. 2010), ingesting As-laden water as they forage. The Sonora mud turtle populations that inhabit MW and adjacent Wet Beaver Creek have persisted during several decades of research, underscoring the resilience of these turtles under chronic exposure to elevated levels of As. Yet no visible health problems were noted in the MW population, other than the observation of emaciation in 2 necropsied turtles that may or may not have been caused by As exposure.

Data Availability

Data generated during this study are available from the US Geological Survey ScienceBase-Catalog (Lovich et al. 2024; Kulp et al. 2024).

Acknowledgments

Thanks to David Earl Green, Barb Bodenstein, and Jennifer Buckner of the US Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center for processing opportunistically obtained dead turtles for necropsies. Andreas Lehner and John Buckweitz at Michigan State University, Diagnostic Center for Population and Animal Health ran additional chemical analyses on those same dead turtles. R.M.R. thanks the DGAPA-PASPA program and CONAHCYT for its sabbatical grants. Research was conducted under permit numbers MOCA-2007-SCI-0002 and MOCA-2008-SCI-0003, MOCA-2010-SCI-0005 and renewals, and MOCA-2015-SCI-0001 from the National Park Service. All capture and handling of turtles followed the recommendations for field studies of the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH 2004) and were conducted under permits SP574796, SP643562, and SP684131 from the Arizona Game and Fish Department. Research was funded by the Western National Parks Association. Fieldwork starting in 2007 followed Animal Care and Use (IACUC) Protocol Number 07-004 (and renewals) through Northern Arizona University (earlier fieldwork did not require IACUC approval), and SP684131 and SP551535 from the Arizona Department of Game and Fish. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

LITERATURE CITED

  • Agusa, T., Takagi, K., Iwata, H., and Tanabe,S. 2008. Arsenic species and their accumulation features in green turtles (Chelonia mydas). Marine Pollution Bulletin57:782789.
  • Akbal, A., Yilmaz, H., and Tutkun,E. 2014. Arsenic exposure associated with decreased bone mineralization in male. Aging Male17:256258.
  • Alam, S. and Brim,M. 2000. Organochlorine, PCB, PAH, and metal concentrations in eggs of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) from northwest Florida, USA. Journal of Environmental Science & Health Part B35:705724.
  • Alibardi, L. 2005. Proliferation in the epidermis of chelonians and growth of the horny scutes. Journal of Morphology265:5269.
  • Aresco, M. J., Travis, J., and MacRae,P. S. D. 2015. Trophic interactions of turtles in a north Florida lake food web: prevalence of omnivory. Copeia103:343356.
  • Barraza, A. D., Komoroske, L. M., Allen, C., Eguchi, T., Gossett, R., Holland, E., Lawson, D. D., Leroux, R. A., Long, A. and Seminoff,J. A. 2019. Trace metals in green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) inhabiting two southern California coastal estuaries. Chemosphere223:342350.
  • Blinn, D. W. 2008.
    The extreme environment, trophic structure, and ecosystem dynamics of a large, fishless desert spring—Montezuma Well, Arizona
    . In: Stevens,L. E. and Meretsky,V. J.(Eds.) Aridland Springs in North America.
    Tucson
    :
    University of Arizona Press
    , pp. 98126.
  • Blinn, D.W. and Sanderson,M.W. 1989. Aquatic insects in Montezuma Well, Arizona, USA: a travertine spring mound with high alkalinity and dissolved carbon dioxide. Great Basin Naturalist49:8588.
  • Boucher, P., Blinn, D. W., and Johnson,D. B. 1984. Phytoplankton ecology in an unusually stable environment (Montezuma Well, Arizona, USA). Hydrobiologia119:149160.
  • Burger, J., Jeitner, C., Schneider, L., Vogt, R., and Gochfeld,M. 2009. Arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and selenium levels in blood of four species of turtles from the Amazon in Brazil. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A73:3340.
  • Canzanella, S., Danese, A., Mandato, M., Lucifora, G., Riverso, C., Federico, G., Gallo, P., et al. 2021. Concentrations of trace elements in tissues of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) from the Tyrrhenian and the Ionian coastlines (Calabria, Italy). Environmental Science and Pollution Research28:2654526557.
  • Chen, C. Y. and Folt,C. L. 2000. Bioaccumulation and diminution of arsenic and lead in a freshwater food web. Environmental Science & Technology34:38783884.
  • Clark, J. W. Jr., Bickham, D. R., Baker, D. L., and Cowman,D. F. 2000. Environmental contaminants in Texas, USA, wetland reptiles: evaluation using blood samples. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry19:22592265.
  • Cochran, J. P., Haskins, D. L., Eady, N. A., Hamilton, M. T., Pilgrim, M. A., and Tuberville,T. D. 2018. Coal combustion residues and their effects on trace element accumulation and health indices of eastern mud turtles (Kinosternon subrubrum). Environmental Pollution243:346353.
  • Coe, M. J., Bourn, D., and Swingland,I. R. 1979. The biomass, production and carrying capacity of giant tortoises on Aldabra. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Part B286:163176.
  • Cole, G. A., and Barry,W. T. 1973. Montezuma Well, Arizona, as a habitat. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science8:713.
  • Congdon, J. D., Greene, J. L., and Gibbons,J. W. 1986. Biomass of freshwater turtles: a geographic comparison. American Midland Naturalist115:165173.
  • Davenport, J., and Wrench,J. 1990. Metal levels in a leatherback turtle. Marine Pollution Bulletin21:4041.
  • Deem, S. L., Dierenfeld, E. S., Sounguet, G. P., Alleman, A. R., Cray, C., Poppenga, R. H., Norton, T. M., and Karesh,W. B. 2006. Blood values in free-ranging nesting leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) on the coast of the Republic of Gabon. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine37:464471.
  • Dovick, M. A., Kulp, T. R., Arkle, R. S., and Pilliod,D. S. 2015. Bioaccumulation trends of arsenic and antimony in a freshwater ecosystem affected by mine drainage. Environmental Chemistry13:149159.
  • Drost, C.A., Lovich, J. E., Rosen, P. C., and Malone,M. 2021a. Sonora mud turtles and non-native turtles, Montezuma Well, Yavapai County, Arizona, 19832015. US Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9EL65UI.
  • Drost, C. A., Lovich, J. E., Rosen, P. C., Malone, M., and Garber,S. D. 2021b. Non-native pond sliders cause long-term decline of native Sonora mud turtles: a 33-year before-after study in an undisturbed natural environment. Aquatic Invasions16:542570.
  • Eisler, R. 1988.
    Arsenic hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review
    . Contaminant Hazard Reviews Report No. 12.
    Laurel, MD
    , 65 pp.
  • Ernst, C. H. and Lovich,J. E. 2009. Turtles of the United States and Canada.
    Second Edition
    .
    Baltimore
    :
    Johns Hopkins University Press
    .
  • Foust, M. Jr., Brandstrom, R., Evans, G., Nez, P., Waupoose, D., and Hillman,E. 2007. Source identification for groundwater arsenic in the Verde Valley, Central Arizona, USA. Trace Metals and Other Contaminants in the Environment9:85100.
  • Foust, P. Jr., Mohapatra, R., Compton-O’Brien, A.-M., and Reifel,J. 2004. Groundwater arsenic in the Verde Valley in central Arizona, USA. Applied Geochemistry19:251255.
  • Foust, A.-M. Jr., Bauer, R. D., Costanza-Robinson, M., Blinn, D. W., Prince, R. C., Pickering, I. J., and George,G. N. 2016. Arsenic transfer and biotransformation in a fully characterized freshwater food web. Coordination Chemistry Reviews306:558565.
  • Fujihara, J., Kunito, T., Kubota, R., and Tanabe,S. 2003. Arsenic accumulation in livers of pinnipeds, seabirds and sea turtles: subcellular distribution and interaction between arsenobetaine and glycine betaine. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C136:287296.
  • Gamble, L. R., Jackson, G., and Maurer,T. 1988. Organochorine, trace element, and petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants investigation of the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas, 1985–1986.
    US Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services
    ,
    Corpus Christi, Texas
    .
  • Ghosh, D., Ghosh, A., and Bhadury,P. 2022. Arsenic through aquatic trophic levels: effects, transformations and biomagnification—a concise review. Geoscience Letters9:117.
  • Godley, B., Gaywood, M., Law, R., McCarthy, C., McKenzie, C., Patterson, I., Penrose, R., et al. 1998. Patterns of marine turtle mortality in British waters (1992–1996) with reference to tissue contaminant levels. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom78:973984.
  • Haskins, D. L., Hamilton, M. T., Jones, A. L., Finger, J. W. Jr, Bringolf, R. B., and Tuberville,T. D. 2017. Accumulation of coal combustion residues and their immunological effects in the yellow-bellied slider (Trachemys scripta scripta). Environmental Pollution224:810819.
  • Hillenbrand, M., Wu, M., Braeuer, S., Goessler, W., and Li,X. 2022. Trace element accumulation in two turtle species, Malaclemys terrapin and Chelydra serpentina, in New Jersey, USA. Biological Trace Element Research200:18441853.
  • Hulse, A. C. 1974. Food habits and feeding behavior of Kinosternon sonoriense (Chelonia: Kinosternidae). Journal of Herpetology8:195199.
  • Jamwal, A., Rachamalla, M., and Niyogi,S. 2023.
    Environmental toxicology of arsenic to wildlife (nonhuman species): exposure, accumulation, toxicity, and regulations
    . In: Flora,S. J. S.(Ed.). Handbook of Arsenic Toxicology.
    Second Edition
    .
    Oxford
    :
    Academic Press
    , pp. 791820.
  • Keon, N. E., Swartz, C., Brabander, D., Harvey, C., and Hemond,H. 2001. Validation of an arsenic sequential extraction method for evaluating mobility in sediments. Environmental Science and Technology35:27782784.
  • King, K. A., Martinez, C. T., and Rosen,P. C. 1996. Contaminants in Sonoran mud turtles from Quitobaquito Springs Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona. US Fish and Wildlife Region 2 Contaminants Program report, 12 pp.
  • Konieczki, A. D. and Leake,S. A. 1997. Hydrogeology and water chemistry of Montezuma Well in Montezuma Castle National Monument and surrounding area, Arizona. US Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 97–4156.
    US Department of Interior
    .
  • Kubota, R., Kunito, T., and Tanabe,S. 2002. Chemical speciation of arsenic in the livers of higher trophic marine animals. Marine Pollution Bulletin45:218223.
  • Kubota, R., Kunito, T., and Tanabe,S. 2003. Occurrence of several arsenic compounds in the liver of birds, cetaceans, pinnipeds, and sea turtles. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry22:12001207.
  • Kulp, T. R., Hoeft, S., Miller, L., Saltikov, C., Murphy, J., Han, S., and Lanoil,B. 2006. Dissimilatory arsenate and sulfate reduction in sediments of two hypersaline, arsenic-rich soda lakes: Mono and Searles Lakes, California. Applied and Environmental Microbiology72:65146526.
  • Kulp, T.R., Lovich, J. E., and Drost,C. 2024. Measurements of arsenic in Sonora mud turtles and their food web at Montezuma Well, Arizona 2010–2015. US Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P1R5AIDD.
  • Kulp, T. R., Miller, L., Braiotta, F., Webb, S., Kocar, B., Blum, J., and Oremland,R. S. 2014. Microbiological reduction of Sb(V) in anoxic freshwater sediments. Environmental Science and Technology48:218226.
  • Lovich, J., Drost, C., Monatesti, A. J., Casper, D., Wood, D. A., and Girard,M. 2010. Reptilian prey of the Sonora mud turtle (Kinosternon Sonoriense) with comments on saurophagy and ophiophagy in North American turtles. Southwestern Naturalist55:135138.
  • Lovich, J. E., Ennen, J. R., Agha, M., and Gibbons,J. W. 2018. Where have all the turtles gone, and why does it matter? BioScience68:771781.
  • Lovich, J.E., Kulp, T.R., Drost, C., Macip-Rios, R., Knowles, S., and Ennen,J. 2024. Arsenic levels in necropsied Sonora mud turtles from Montezuma Well, Arizona in 2015. US Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P1BRSRTX.
  • Macip-Ríos, R., Sustaita-Rodríguez, V. H., Barrios-Quiroz, G., and Casas-Andreu,G. 2010. Alimentary habits of the Mexican mud turtle (Kinosternon integrum) in Tonatico, Estado de Mexico. Chelonian Conservation and Biology9:9097.
  • Maeda, S., Ohki, A., Tokuda, T., and Ohmine,M. 1990. Transformation of arsenic compounds in a freshwater food chain. Applied Organometallic Chemistry4:251254.
  • Mandal, P. 2017. An insight of environmental contamination of arsenic on animal health. Emerging Contaminants3:1722.
  • Martínez-López, E., Herrero, D., López-Berenguer, G., and Peñalver,J. 2021. Total arsenic concentrations in sea turtle tissues from the Mediterranean coast of Spain. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology107:820826.
  • Mason, R., Laporte, J.-M., and Andres,S. 2000. Factors controlling the bioaccumulation of mercury, methylmercury, arsenic, selenium, and cadmium by freshwater invertebrates and fish. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology38:283297.
  • Meharg, A. A. and Hartley‐Whitaker,J. 2002. Arsenic uptake and metabolism in arsenic resistant and nonresistant plant species. New Phytologist154:2943.
  • Mithander, A., Göen, T., Felding, G., and Jacobsen,P. 2017. Assessment of museum staff exposure to arsenic while handling contaminated exhibits by urinalysis of arsenic species. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology12:15.
  • Neff, J. M. 2002. Chapter 3 - Arsenic in the Ocean, p. 57–78. In: Neff, J. M. (Ed.) Bioaccumulation in Marine Organisms. J. M. Neff (ed.). Elsevier, Oxford.
  • Quintela, F. M., Lima, G. P., Silveira, M. L., Costa, P. G., Bianchini, A., Loebmann, D., and Martins,S. E. 2019. High arsenic and low lead concentrations in fish and reptiles from Taim wetlands, a Ramsar site in southern Brazil. Science of the Total Environment660:10041014.
  • Ricketson, J. M., Ricketson, G. M., and Greenawalt,T. L. 2018. A new species of Potamogeton (Potamogetonaceae) from the unique habitat: Montezuma Well, Arizona, USA. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas12:447459.
  • Rowe, C. L. 2008. “The calamity of so long life”: life histories, contaminants, and potential emerging threats to long-lived vertebrates. BioScience58:623631.
  • Roy, D., Das, T. Kumar, and Vaswani,S. 2013. Arsenic: its extent of pollution and toxicosis: an animal perspective. Veterinary World6:5358.
  • Saeki, K., Sakakibara, H., Sakai, H., Kunito, T., and Tanabe,S. 2000. Arsenic accumulation in three species of sea turtles. BioMetals13:241250.
  • Seltzer, M. and Berry,K. 2005. Laser ablation ICP-MS profiling and semiquantitative determination of trace element concentrations in desert tortoise shells: documenting the uptake of elemental toxicants. Science of the Total Environment339:253265.
  • Senanayake, J. 2005. Evidence for arsenic in the diet of the southern Sinagua of the Verde Valley, Arizona.
    Flagstaff
    :
    Northern Arizona University
    .
  • Stone, P. A., Congdon, J. D., Stone, M. E. B., Stuart, J. N., Iverson, J. B., and Rosen,P. C. 2022.
    Kinosternon sonoriense (LeConte 1854)–Sonora mud turtle, desert mud turtle, Sonoyta mud turtle, Casquito de Sonora
    . In: Rhodin,A. G. J.,Iverson,J. B.,van Dijk,P. P.,Stanford,C. B.,Goode,E. V.,Buhlmann,K. A., and Mittermeier,R. A.(Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group.
    Chelonian Research Monographs
    , pp. 119.111122.
  • Storelli, M. M. and Marcotrigiano,G. 2000. Total organic and inorganic arsenic from marine turtles (Caretta caretta) beached along the Italian coast (South Adriatic Sea). Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology65:732739.
  • Van De Merwe, J. P., Hodge, M., Olszowy, H. A., Whittier, J. M., Ibrahim, K., and Lee,S. Y. 2009. Chemical contamination of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) eggs in peninsular Malaysia: implications for conservation and public health. Environmental Health Perspectives117:13971401.
  • Wagemann, R., Snow, N., Rosenberg, D., and Lutz,A. 1978. Arsenic in sediments, water and aquatic biota from lakes in the vicinity of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology7:169191.
  • Wahlen R., Evans L., Turner J, and HearnR. 2005. The use of collision/reaction cell ICP-MS for the determination of elements in blood and serum samples. Spectroscopy20(
    12
    ):8489.
  • Wang, N., Ye, Z., Huang, L., Zhang, C., Guo, Y., and Zhang,W. 2022. Arsenic occurrence and cycling in the aquatic environment: a comparison between freshwater and seawater. Water15:147.
  • Welch, A. H., Westjohn, D., Helsel, D. R., and Wanty,R. B. 2000. Arsenic in ground water of the United States: occurrence and geochemistry. Groundwater38:589604.
  • Zhang, W., Miao, A.-J., Wang, N.-X., Li, C., Sha, J., Jia, J., Alessi, D. S., et al. 2022. Arsenic bioaccumulation and biotransformation in aquatic organisms. Environment International163:107221.
Copyright: © 2024 Chelonian Research Foundation 2024

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author

Handling Editor: Vivian P. Páez

Received: 23 Jul 2024
Accepted: 13 Nov 2024
  • Download PDF